Magnetic field around a wire near ferrous materials

AI Thread Summary
The magnetic field around a current-carrying wire is influenced by nearby ferrous materials, altering its strength and direction. When high permeability materials are present, they can enhance the magnetic field, making it stronger at the location of low permeability objects. The field will still flow in concentric circles but may be distorted towards the high permeability material. This distortion effectively shortens the path of the magnetic field, increasing its strength in the surrounding area. Consequently, the presence of high permeability materials can lead to a greater magnetic effect on low permeability objects nearby.
EddieP
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I was wondering if I could ask a question on the magnetic field surrounding a current-carrying wire, and how this field might change with the presence of other, ferrous materials nearby.

I have been using this web page
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/magnetic/magcur.html#c3
to calculate the magnetic field around the wire, which the page shows moving in concentric circles.
The site gives the formula B = (μ0*I)/(2*pi*r) Where I is the current in Amperes, and r is the distance from the wire in meters.
This formula is for a wire surrounded by air, but I am wondering what might happen if some other objects were close to the wire (as close as r in the formula)

I am interested in a situation where a high permeability object and a low permeability object are positioned equal distance from the wire.
I am assuming the presence of the high permeability material would make the magnetic field around the wire stronger.
Would the field would still flow in a concentric circle, or would the field be diverted in the direction of the high permeability material?
If the goal was to exert a stronger force on the low permeability object, would the resulting magnetic field have a stronger effect on the low permeability object?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
EddieP said:
I am wondering what might happen if some other objects were close to the wire
The magnetic field will be distorted. Think of if you have to travel some ( long ) distance by car, you will prefer to use the highway for a long distance, though the total distance ( distance on highway + distance on smaller roads ) may become some longer. You are choosing the fastest way, not the shortest.

The material with the high permeability is the highway, air is the smaller road.

upload_2015-7-11_21-17-45.png
 
EddieP said:
If the goal was to exert a stronger force on the low permeability object, would the resulting magnetic field have a stronger effect on the low permeability object?
Yes, because the path through the air has been shortened a bit, thus the field strength of the magnetic field, measured in the unit [ A/m ], has increased outside the object with high permeability, and thus at the location of the low permeability object. ( I don't know if that is understandable? ).
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...

Similar threads

Back
Top