Magnetic Field Due to a Curved Wire Segment

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of the magnetic field due to a curved wire segment, specifically addressing the integration process involved. Participants clarify that while limits of integration are not strictly necessary for the integral over the curved path AC, defining the integration domain as the curve itself (using the notation ##\int_S##) can enhance clarity. The conversation also highlights the distinction between using a line integral for summing length elements along a path versus integrating around a closed loop, emphasizing the importance of notation in mathematical expressions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of line integrals in vector calculus
  • Familiarity with magnetic fields and their mathematical representation
  • Knowledge of integration techniques in calculus
  • Ability to interpret mathematical notation and symbols
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of line integrals in vector calculus
  • Explore the application of magnetic fields in physics, particularly in curved wire segments
  • Learn about different notations used in calculus and their implications
  • Investigate the concept of closed loop integrals and their significance in electromagnetism
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, electrical engineers, and mathematicians interested in electromagnetism and vector calculus applications.

member 731016
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
Please see below
For this problem,
1673674584161.png

The solution is,
1673674646262.png

However, why did they not use limits of integration for the integral in red? When I solved this, I used
1673674712595.png

as limits of integration.

I see that is not necessary since you get the same answer either way, but is there a deeper reason?

Many thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The text says "integrate over the curved path AC", so it was not essential to write that in the algebra. Also, one does not always have to specify the integration domain as a pair of endpoints. They could have defined S as the curve AC and written ##\int_S##.
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR and member 731016
haruspex said:
The text says "integrate over the curved path AC", so it was not essential to write that in the algebra. Also, one does not always have to specify the integration domain as a pair of endpoints. They could have defined S as the curve AC and written ##\int_S##.
Thanks for your help @haruspex ! That second notation you mention makes more sense than their single integral over ds. I think another way to avoid implicitly defining an integration domain is by using a line integral
1673676771265.png
to denote that we are summing the length elements over the path, correct?
 

Attachments

  • 1673676644883.png
    1673676644883.png
    963 bytes · Views: 137
Callumnc1 said:
Thanks for your help @haruspex ! That second notation you mention makes more sense than their single integral over ds. I think another way to avoid implicitly defining an integration domain is by using a line integral View attachment 320352to denote that we are summing the length elements over the path, correct?
No, that symbol is for integrating around a closed loop.
 
  • Like
Likes hutchphd and member 731016
haruspex said:
No, that symbol is for integrating around a closed loop.
Oh, thank you for your help @haruspex !
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
630
Replies
11
Views
4K