Magnetic field far from a solenoid

AI Thread Summary
The magnetic field inside a solenoid is given by μIn/L, while outside it is typically zero near the solenoid. However, at a point far from a long solenoid, the magnetic field behaves similarly to that of a straight wire, calculated as μI/2πR. This is particularly true if the solenoid is wound in a spiral, as the continuous winding creates a field equivalent to that of a long straight wire. Even if the solenoid is not infinitely long, the external field remains consistent with that of a single wire due to the spiral configuration.
jaumzaum
Messages
433
Reaction score
33
I know the magnetic field inside the solenoid is μIn/L and outside is 0 (provided that the point is near the solenoid).

But if we had a long solenoid and choose a point far from the solenoid (and perpendicular to it), would it behave like a wire? Would the magnetic field be μI/2πR?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jaumzaum said:
I know the magnetic field inside the solenoid is μIn/L and outside is 0 (provided that the point is near the solenoid).

But if we had a long solenoid and choose a point far from the solenoid (and perpendicular to it), would it behave like a wire? Would the magnetic field be μI/2πR?

If the solenoid is wound as a spiral, which it usually is, then the field outside it would be the same as a long straight wire. That's because the coil inside has to be wound continuously from end to end. You can think of the coil as the sum of N (N→ ∞) perfectly perpendicular turns, each with a small gap, and a long single wire joining all the turns at the gaps. Whether the gaps are all lined up or random or any other orientation makes no diff.

In fact, even if the solenoid is not of infinite length, the field outside would be the same as if it was just a single wire, again if it was wound in a spiral.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solenoid
 
Thanks man
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top