Magnetic Field of a Slab - What Loops Can Help Solve This Problem?

Saraharris38
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A thick slab extending from z=-a to z=+a carries a uniform volume current J=J (in the x direction) Find the magnetic field, as a function of z, both inside and outside the slab.

Homework Equations



∫Bdl=(µ0)Ienc

The Attempt at a Solution



I am not sure how to start this. Could someone explain why B is a function of z? Is this just a set-up for the question, or is B obviously a function of z? I also don't really know how to conceptually explain this problem. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, for starters, magnetic field is a thing that exists all throughout space. Different points in space have different values of z. When you specify the value of magnetic field somewhere, you will specify that "somewhere" by giving a value for z (along with values for x and y). Thus B is a function of z.

I'm guessing what you meant to ask, though, was "or is B obviously a non-constant function of z?" But it doesn't say that. B could be independent of z for all you know. (The problem's wording does indeed suggest - but only suggest, not guarantee - that that is not the case.)

To start with, do you understand the meaning of the equation
\int \vec{B}\cdot\mathrm{d}\vec{l} = \mu_0 I_\text{enc}
? Well enough to conceptually explain it?

If you do, think about what sorts of loops you could draw that might be useful.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top