Magnetic Field of A Straight Conductor

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the magnetic field created by a straight conductor carrying a current of 400 Amps, positioned 5 meters above the ground. For part A, the magnetic field was calculated using the formula B=(μ₀I)/(2πr), yielding a value of 1.60x10^-5 Teslas directed into the plane of the paper. In part B, it was argued that the Earth's magnetic field, approximately 0.5 x 10^-4 Teslas, is significantly stronger than the field from the conductor, suggesting that the current would not notably affect compass accuracy. A mathematical approach to verify this involves calculating the resultant vector of the two magnetic fields to determine any deviation. The discussion emphasizes the importance of considering both the conductor's and Earth's magnetic fields in assessing their combined effect on compass readings.
shikagami
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Here is a problem that I don't quite understand.

P: Two hikers are reading a compass under an overhead transmission line that is 5.0 meters above the ground and carries a current of 400 Amps in a direction from south to north.

a. Find the magnitude and direction of the magnetic field at a point on the ground directly under the conductor.

b. One hiker suggests they walk on another 50 meters to avoid inaccurate compass readings caused by the current. Considering that the magnitude of the Earth's field is of the order of 0.5 x 10^-4 Teslas, is the current really a problem?

Here is how I did it:

For part A I figured I should find the permeability by the formula (k'=Mo/4pi). After finding Mo (1.26x10^-6 N/A^2), I used the formula for a magnetic field of a straight wire [B=(MoI)/(2 (pi) r)]. I got 1.60x10^-5 Teslas for the magnetic field going into the plane of the paper.

For part B I said that since the Earth's magnitude is much bigger than that of the conductor that the conductor will not cause a significant problem to the accuracy of the compass readings.

Are any of my solutions right? Is there a mathematical way to prove part B?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
shikagami said:
Here is a problem that I don't quite understand.

P: Two hikers are reading a compass under an overhead transmission line that is 5.0 meters above the ground and carries a current of 400 Amps in a direction from south to north.

a. Find the magnitude and direction of the magnetic field at a point on the ground directly under the conductor.

b. One hiker suggests they walk on another 50 meters to avoid inaccurate compass readings caused by the current. Considering that the magnitude of the Earth's field is of the order of 0.5 x 10^-4 Teslas, is the current really a problem?

Here is how I did it:

For part A I figured I should find the permeability by the formula (k'=Mo/4pi). After finding Mo (1.26x10^-6 N/A^2), I used the formula for a magnetic field of a straight wire [B=(MoI)/(2 (pi) r)]. I got 1.60x10^-5 Teslas for the magnetic field going into the plane of the paper.
i see nothing about a sheet of paper in the problem.


For part B I said that since the Earth's magnitude is much bigger than that of the conductor that the conductor will not cause a significant problem to the accuracy of the compass readings.

Are any of my solutions right? Is there a mathematical way to prove part B?
The mathematical way to handle part B, is to find the resultant field vector, and find its angle. This angle will tell you how wrong the hikers may have gotten.
 
P: Two hikers are reading a compass under an overhead transmission line that is 5.0 meters above the ground and carries a current of 400 Amps in a direction from south to north.

a. Find the magnitude and direction of the magnetic field at a point on the ground directly under the conductor.


The current have a magnetic field associated with it, try finding the proper formula. What will the unit vector be? You'll probably need to also consider the magnitude and direction of the Earth's magnetic field

for b, you'll need to find the new r value

feel free to ask further questions
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top