Magnetic field of solenoid and a coil with multiple turns

AI Thread Summary
There are two different equations for calculating the magnetic field of a solenoid and a coil with multiple turns due to their physical differences in length and geometry. The solenoid equation applies to long coils, while the coil equation is for shorter coils. There is no strict threshold for when to switch equations; instead, there is a gradual transition where neither equation may be applicable. The first equation becomes less useful when the solid angle of the end turn is too large, while the second is ineffective if the coil is significantly shorter than a certain length. Both equations are designed to determine the magnetic field along the axis of the coils.
rooks
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Member advised to use the formatting template for all homework help requests
Hi!,

I have a question for you geniuses (geniusi?)

Why are there two different equations to find the magnetic field of a solenoid and a coil with multiple turns?

(According to my textbook)
The equations for each are
Solenoid:
Solenoid.png

Coil with multiple turns:
multiloop.png


Why are they different? Is there a physical difference between a coil and a solenoid?Thanks for the help.
 

Attachments

  • Solenoid.png
    Solenoid.png
    2.6 KB · Views: 898
  • multiloop.png
    multiloop.png
    2.6 KB · Views: 499
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Rooks, :welcome:

Don't double-post, please.
And google a bit before you post: your expressions apply to different kinds of coil: the first one for a long coil
the second for a very short coil

[edit] Google is your friend. Maybe you'll like section 9.4 here
 
Last edited:
BvU said:
Hello Rooks, :welcome:

Don't double-post, please.
And google a bit before you post: your expressions apply to different kinds of coil: the first one for a long coil
the second for a very short coil

Ok, then where is the threshold? When does a coil become too long to use the 2nd equation? When does a solenoid become too short to use the 1st equation?

Also, I meant why does the length matter and make the equation different?
 
rooks said:
Ok, then where is the threshold?
No threshold but a gradual transition.
There is an intermediate range where neither can be used. The first one stops being useful if the solid angle of the end turn becomes too large.
The second one stops being useful if it's significantly lower than 2 ##\pi##.
 
You have to use Biot-Savart for "short" coils. You can use Biot-Savart for "long" coils but Ampere's law is usually OK.

You can use Ampere's law if the length of the coil is long enough to warrant ignoring the B field outside the coil.

As BvU say, there is a transition.

And BTW both approaches allow you to determine the B field on the axis, nowhere else.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top