Magnetic field of the planar wave

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between the magnetic field and electric field in electromagnetic waves, specifically addressing the cross product of unit vectors in a Cartesian system. The right-hand rule is used to explain why k x j equals -i, emphasizing the definitions of unit vectors and the cross product. Participants reference the Maxwell-Faraday equation to establish the connection between electric and magnetic fields. The formula B = (1/c)u x E is highlighted as a valid expression for plane electromagnetic waves. The conversation concludes with an acknowledgment of the explanations provided.
Andrei0408
Messages
50
Reaction score
8
Homework Statement
The electric field for a planar electromagnetic wave propagating in a free space on Oz axis is 𝐸⃗ =
(𝐸0𝑥𝑖 + 𝐸0𝑦𝑗 ) 𝑠𝑖𝑛(𝜔𝑡 − 𝜅𝑧 + 𝜑). Find the magnetic field 𝐵⃗ of the planar wave.
Relevant Equations
Written on paper
I understand that because the vectors are perp, k x i = j, but why is k x j = -i? Why the minus? Could you please explain?
 

Attachments

  • 130713713_821887101705235_4458306952392253975_n.jpg
    130713713_821887101705235_4458306952392253975_n.jpg
    38.6 KB · Views: 128
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
There isn't much to explain, it follows from the definition of the unit vectors in cartesian system and from the definition of cross product that uses the right hand rule
Right-hand rule - Wikipedia
 
I fail to see how you going to answer the question though.. Aren't you going to use the Maxwell-Faraday equation :
$$\nabla\times\mathbf{E}=-\frac{\partial\mathbf{B}}{\partial t}$$
 
This is the way we solved it in class, is there another way?
 

Attachments

  • 1607525804241.png
    1607525804241.png
    18.2 KB · Views: 139
Andrei0408 said:
This is the way we solved it in class, is there another way?
Yes ok , apparently you use this formula $$\mathbf{B}=\frac{1}{c}\mathbf{u}\times\mathbf{E}$$ which is correct for plane EM waves with propagation vector ##\mathbf{u}##. It is a consequence from Maxwell-Faraday equation.

Actually it holds for all waves where the electric field is $$\mathbf{E}=\mathbf{E_0}f(\mathbf{u}\cdot\mathbf{r}\pm \omega t)$$ where ##\mathbf{E_0}## any constant vector and ##f## any real function of a real variable.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Steve4Physics
Delta2 said:
Yes ok , apparently you use this formula $$\mathbf{B}=\frac{1}{c}\mathbf{u}\times\mathbf{E}$$ which is correct for plane EM waves with propagation vector ##\mathbf{u}##. It is a consequence from Maxwell-Faraday equation.
Thank you!
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top