Magnetic field on current loop, involves rotational energy

AI Thread Summary
A rectangular current loop pivots about a fixed axis in a uniform magnetic field, with initial conditions including a current of 3.2 A and an angle of 35° to the x-z plane. The discussion focuses on calculating the loop's angular velocity at 0° using energy conservation principles, equating initial potential energy to final kinetic energy. A mistake was identified regarding the signs in the potential energy equation, leading to confusion in calculations. The correct potential energy expression includes a negative sign, which resolves the issue of obtaining a negative value under the square root. The final consensus confirms that the correct approach to the problem involves adjusting the signs in the potential energy equation.
cdingdong
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A rectangular loop of sides a = 0.3 cm and b = 0.8 cm pivots without friction about a fixed axis (z-axis) that coincides with its left end (see figure). The net current in the loop is I = 3.2 A. A spatially uniform magnetic field with B = 0.005 T points in the +y-direction. The loop initially makes an angle q = 35° with respect to the x-z plane.
https://tycho-s.phys.washington.edu/cgi/courses/shell/common/showme.pl?courses/phys122/autumn08/homework/09/rectangular_loop_MFR/p8.gif

The moment of inertia of the loop about its axis of rotation (left end) is J = 2.9 × 10-6 kg m2. If the loop is released from rest at q = 35°, calculate its angular velocity \omega at q = 0°.

Homework Equations



this is kinetic energy:
KE = 1/2I\omega^{2} but moment of inertia is specified to be J, so

KE = 1/2J\omega^{2}

this is potential energy for a loop with current and magnetic field acting on it:
PE = \muBcos\theta
moment vector \mu = NIA where N = number of loops, I = current, A = area, B = magnetic field

so, PE = NIABcos\theta


The Attempt at a Solution



I recognize that the angular kinetic energy equation can be used to find the angular velocity. KE = 1/2J\omega^{2}.
Final kinetic energy = initial potential energy. Initial potential energy = NIABcos\theta. so, we could say

1/2J\omega^{2} = NIABcos\theta

the right side is potential energy. that equals

N = 1 turn; I = 3.2 Amps; A = 0.003*0.008 = 2.5e-5 meters; B = 0.005 Teslas; \theta = 35 degrees

(1)(3.2)(2.5e-5)(0.005)cos(35) = 3.276608177 * 10^-7 Joules. we'll call this 3.2766e-7
so, now we have

1/2J\omega^{2} = 3.2766e-7

J = 2.9 × 10-6 kilogram meters squared. we'll call this 2.9e-6

1/2(2.9e-6)\omega^{2} = 3.2766e-7

\omega = \sqrt{(2*3.2766e-7)/2.9e-6} = 4.753655581 * 10^-1

BUT, the answer happens to be what I did except that they did not take the square root at the end.
so, they got 2.259724138 * 10^-1.

did i do something wrong? what i did makes sense in my mind. is their answer wrong? why did they not not take a square root at the end? is kinetic energy not = 1/2J\omega^{2}, but instead 1/2J\omega without the square?

i thank everybody in advance!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
cdingdong said:

The Attempt at a Solution



I recognize that the angular kinetic energy equation can be used to find the angular velocity. KE = 1/2J\omega^{2}.
Final kinetic energy = initial potential energy. Initial potential energy = NIABcos\theta. so, we could say

1/2J\omega^{2} = NIABcos\theta
What's the final potential energy, when θ = 0?
 
wow, now that you bring it up, i realize my mistake. you're right! i forgot the final potential energy. so, the answer works, but there is something that bothers me.

Ki + Ui = Kf + Uf

there is no initial kinetic energy because it came from rest, so that is zero

Ui = Kf + Uf

rearranging it,

Ui - Uf = Kf

NIABcos35 - NIABcos0 = 1/2J\omega^{2}

NIAB(cos35 - cos0) = 1/2J\omega^{2}

(1)(3.2)(2.5e-5)(0.005)(cos35 - cos0) = 1/2(2.9e-5)\omega^{2}

-7.233918228 = 1/2(2.9e-5)\omega^{2}

when i find the potential energy, initial PE - final PE, i get a negative number. so, when i set it equal to 1/2J\omega^{2}, i get a square root of a negative number, which is not possible. if i take the square root of the absolute value of that number, the answer is correct. is there something wrong with my signs?
 
cdingdong said:
is there something wrong with my signs?
Yes, your signs are messed up. The correct expression for PE is PE = -IABcosθ (note the minus sign).

So Ui - Uf = (-IABcos35) - (-IABcos0) = IAB(cos0 - cos35).
 
ahhhh, i see. well, that will solve my problem. thanks Doc Al!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top