Magnetic fields around electric current

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on an experiment measuring magnetic fields around an electric current in a straight wire using a search coil. It emphasizes the importance of aligning the search coil with the wire to ensure accurate measurements of induced electromotive force (e.m.f.), as the strongest measurements occur at this alignment. The sensitivity of the search coil was questioned in relation to frequency increases, with the initial assertion that higher frequencies would enhance sensitivity due to more frequent current direction changes. However, it was clarified that no increase in sensitivity was observed, and the output voltage amplitude remained steady, suggesting that the relationship between frequency and sensitivity may not be as straightforward as initially thought. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of measuring induced e.m.f. and the factors affecting the performance of search coils.
chris_yau
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I have just done an experiment of magnetic fields around electric current in straight wire by using the seach coil.

I have 2 questions about this...

(1)why is this necessary to ensure the search coil is at the same level as the wire?
My anwser:If the seach coil is not at the same level as the wire, the measurement is not correct. It is because the induced e.m.f. is the greatest around the wire. We should put the seach coil at the same level to have a clear measurement of induced e.m.f.

(2)why the sensitivity of the seach coil can be increased by increasing the frequency?
My anwser:If the frequency increased, the current changed its direction more frequently. Thus, the induced e.m.f will increase. As a result, the seach coil had a increase in sensitivity.

Am I correct??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
-1- is okay, but -2- is not quite right, I don't think. Did you actually see an increase in output voltage amplitude of the sense coil for higher primary coil drive frequencies? Was the primary coil drive voltage amplitude changing as well, or was it steady?
 
To be frank, it is the question in the report.
Actually, I didn't see the increase of the sensitivity.
The amplitude is steady.
 
The only effect that I can think of that would make someone think there was increased sensitivity is if the drive circuit for the primary coil couldn't drive the low inductance of the coil at low frequencies. But the transfer function between the primary and secondary coils should not vary with frequency. If there is ferrite or iron or something connecting the primary and secondary, you will get losses that depend on the material.
 
Thank you for your help~!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top