Magnetic Flux Through a Tilted Medium

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of inductance in a ferromagnetic medium shaped as a cylinder, particularly when tilted at an angle. Participants explore the mathematical relationships and implications of inductance as it relates to the geometry of the medium and the magnetic flux produced by a magnetomotive force.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation, Debate/contested, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes to analytically prove that the sum of inductances measured along the x-axis and y-axis is independent of the tilt angle.
  • Another participant questions the definition of inductance in the context of a cylinder and expresses confusion over the initial post.
  • Clarifications are made regarding the role of a constant current in generating a magnetomotive force, which is essential for defining inductance.
  • Some participants argue that the problem as stated does not make sense and question the understanding of inductance by the original poster.
  • There is a discussion about the appropriate formulas for inductance, with references to reluctance and the geometry of the ferromagnetic medium.
  • One participant suggests that inductance is a scalar quantity and cannot be broken into x and y components, while another counters that projections can be made to calculate inductances along those axes.
  • It is noted that the inductance is already independent of the angle by definition, raising questions about the necessity of the proposed analysis.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity of the original problem statement and the approach to calculating inductance. There is no consensus on the correctness of the proposed methods or the interpretation of inductance in this context.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include the dependence on the definitions of inductance and reluctance, as well as the assumptions made regarding the geometry and properties of the ferromagnetic medium. The discussion also highlights the challenges of applying certain formulas to short ferromagnetic cores.

magnetpedro
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Imagine a ferromagnetic medium shaped as a cylinder (a ferromagnetic fiber) with a magnetic relative permeability of μr, tilted with an angle a, as shown in the picture.

220px-Cylinder_geometry.svg.png

I would like to prove analytically that the sum of the inductances measured along the x-axis (angle is a) and y-axis (angle is π/2 - a) is independent of the angle a. (Lsum = Lx + Ly independent of a).

Each case, Lx and Ly is also the sum of the inductance of the projections of the fiber in the x and y axis.
My approach consists in using Hopkinson's Law and first determining the Reluctance for each case, and then calculating the Inductance using L= N2/Reluctance, where N is a constant number of turns of a supposed magnetomotive force.

Do you think it's possible?

Thank you very much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't understand your post. What is the inductance of a cylinder?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: magnetpedro
marcusl said:
Don't understand your post. What is the inductance of a cylinder?

It's the Inductance of a ferromagnetic medium shaped as a cylinder, that is crossed by a flux produced by a magnetomotive force.
At least was this that I meant to say. Beg your pardon if I wasn't clear.
 
Inductance is a quantity that relates energy stored in a magnetic field to the currents producung the field. It also relates an induced emf to a changing current. You have no currents, hence no inductance.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: magnetpedro
marcusl said:
Inductance is a quantity that relates energy stored in a magnetic field to the currents producung the field. It also relates an induced emf to a changing current. You have no currents, hence no inductance.

My mistake, forgot to mention that the magnetomotive force is produced by a current I (constant). That's my current.
 
Your problem doesn't make sense as stated and suggests that you don't understand inductance. Have you had an undergrad E&M course?
 
marcusl said:
Your problem doesn't make sense as stated and suggests that you don't understand inductance. Have you had an undergrad E&M course?

Yes I have. I'll try to explain this model.
Imagine that a magnetomotive force is produced by a number of turns N and a current I, being Fmm=N*I.
That magnetomotive force creates a magnetic flux ∅ that only crosses the ferromagnetic cylinder.
The inductance of the ferromagnetic medium/fiber can be determined using the following expressions:

L = N× ∅ / I

∅ = Fmm/R

L = N2/R

where R is the reluctance of the ferromagnetic medium, given by:

R= l/(μ0r*A)

where l is the length of the path of the magnetic flux, μ0 is the magnetic constant (vacuum's permeability), μr is the relative magnetic permeabilty of the ferromagnetic cylinder and A is the area that is crossed by the flux.
 
These formulas are usually written in terms of the number of turns per unit length n, in which case [itex]L=\frac{n^2l}{R}[/itex]. Furthermore, this applies to long solenoids. Since your core is short, this will be an approximation at best.

To your original question, however, inductance is a scalar quantity so you can't break it into x and y components.
 
marcusl said:
These formulas are usually written in terms of the number of turns per unit length n, in which case [itex]L=\frac{n^2l}{R}[/itex]. Furthermore, this applies to long solenoids. Since your core is short, this will be an approximation at best.

To your original question, however, inductance is a scalar quantity so you can't break it into x and y components.

Yes, inductance is a scalar quantity but I can make a projection of the ferromagnetic fiber along x and y, with a length and cross area also projected, calculate both Inductances Lx and Ly, and then the "final" inductance would be L = sqrt(Lx^2 + Ly^2).
 
  • #10
Well yes, you could do that, but I don't see the value since L is already independent of your angle, by definition.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
18K