Magnetic force on a wire problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the magnetic force per unit length on a wire within a bundle of insulated wires. The user correctly identifies the number of wires contributing to the magnetic field and calculates the magnetic field strength using Ampere's law, resulting in a value of 0.0032 T. However, there is confusion regarding the final force per unit length calculation, which yields 0.0064 N/m, deemed incorrect. Participants suggest the user clarify the direction of the force and consider potential errors in logic or calculations. The user remains uncertain about the accuracy of their answer and the correctness of the textbook.
Sheneron
Messages
360
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A packed bundle of 100 long, straight, insulated wires forms a cylinder of radius R = 0.500 cm.
(a) If each wire carries 2.00 A, what are the magnitude and direction of the magnetic force per unit length acting on a wire located 0.200 cm from the center of the bundle?

Homework Equations


F= ILB

B = \frac{\mu_{0}I_{enc}}{2\pi r}

The Attempt at a Solution



Here is what I did to get the solution:

I can find the number of wires in out to where the radius equals 0.002m.
\frac{\pi(0.002)^2}{\pi(0.005)^2}*100 = Number of Wires

That gives me 16 wires and since each has 2 amps the current enclosed = 32 A.

Using ampere's law:

B = \frac{(4\pi * 10^{-7})(32)}{2\pi(0.002)}

B = 0.0032

Knowning B I can find the force per unit length on one wire with 2 amps of current.

\frac{F}{L} = (2)(0.0032)

That equals 0.0064 N/m

That answer is wrong and I can't figure out why. If anyone can help it would be appreciated. Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you mean .0064N/m
 
yes I did, sorry
 
I can't figure out what could be wrong with this.
 
Looks okay to me too..
 
The instructions request the direction as well as the magnitude...
You have the magnitude: 6.34mN/m
I'd say you need to articulate the direction ("inward"), ,otherwise you are absolutely correct.
:-p
 
Well I got an answer of 6.4mN/m which is not the right answer. 3 options. Something is wrong in my logic. Something is wrong in my calculations. Or the books is wrong.
 
Back
Top