Magnetic Force on Moving Charges

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the acceleration of a proton moving downward at 355 m/s in a magnetic field of 4.05 x 10^-5 T near the Earth's equator. The formula used for acceleration is derived from the magnetic force equation, yielding a result of 1.38 x 10^16 m/s^2. Participants express uncertainty about the relevance of the magnetic force's direction and the angle of the proton's movement relative to Earth's magnetic lines. There is a consensus that the question lacks clarity, particularly regarding its context. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities involved in applying magnetic force concepts to moving charges.
AcidicVision
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
A proton high above the equator approaches the Earth moving straight downward with a speed of 355 m/s. Find the acceleration of the proton, given that the magnetic field at its altitude is 4.05 X 10^-5 T.


Homework Equations



F = MA
=eVBsin?
a = evB/m


The Attempt at a Solution



a = ((1.6x10^-9C)(355 m/s)(4.05x10^-5)/(1.673x10^-27)) = 1.38x10^16 m/s^2



My attempt is pretty straight forward, but I think I am missing something. There has to be some relevance to the magnet force near the equator and the angle that the particle is moving, I think its perpendicular to Earth's magnetic lines, but I am not sure.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
AcidicVision said:
A proton high above the equator approaches the Earth moving straight downward with a speed of 355 m/s. Find the acceleration of the proton, given that the magnetic field at its altitude is 4.05 X 10^-5 T.

My attempt is pretty straight forward, but I think I am missing something. There has to be some relevance to the magnet force near the equator and the angle that the particle is moving, I think its perpendicular to Earth's magnetic lines, but I am not sure.

Hi AcidicVision! :smile:

I think you're right … assuming they mean the magnetic equator :rolleyes:

not a very good question, is it?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top