Magnetic Force on Wire 2: Verification Needed

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the magnetic force exerted by Wire 1 on Wire 2, which is part of a rectangular loop carrying current I2. The formula F = IL x B is highlighted for determining the force. Participants emphasize the importance of accurately drawing all force directions in the provided diagram to understand the magnitude and direction of the forces involved. It is noted that Amperes Law is not necessary for calculating the force on the top section of Wire 2, while it can be applied to the forces on the sides. The thread seeks verification of the calculations and understanding of the forces acting on the wires.
mathguy831
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
1. Wire 1 is oriented along the y-axis and carries a current I1. A rectangular loop located to the right of the wire in the xy-plane carries a current I2. Find the magnetic force exerted by wire 1 on the top wire of length b in the loop labeled "Wire 2" in the figure.2. F = IL x B

3. Attached is the picture needed for the problem as well as my attempt at the problem. Can someone please verify that my work is correct?
 

Attachments

  • 20141029_164024.jpg
    20141029_164024.jpg
    15.4 KB · Views: 316
  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    106.7 KB · Views: 458
Physics news on Phys.org
hi mathguy

1) for a start draw ALL your force directions on the diagram, not just the top one

2) after you have done that what do you discover about the magnitude and direction of the 4 forces ?
You don't need Amperes Law to work out the force on the top section of wire

3) that will give you your answer

4) for the forces on the 2 sides you can use Amperes Law
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top