Magnetic interaction between moving and stationary charge

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the magnetic interaction between a stationary metal sphere with charge q1 and a moving sphere with charge q2. The main confusion arises regarding the magnetic force acting on the stationary sphere, as it is not in motion and thus seemingly should not experience a magnetic force. Participants note that while there may be current due to electron movement, treating the spheres as point charges suggests that the magnetic force on the stationary charge should be zero. The focus shifts to calculating the total force, which includes the electric component, rather than solely the magnetic aspect. Ultimately, the problem highlights the complexities of magnetic interactions in electrostatics.
whatisreality
Messages
286
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A metal sphere, with charge q1=-2.80μC is held still and off the ground on an insulating rod. Another smaller metal sphere with charge q2=-7.80μC is projected towards q1. When the two spheres are 0.80m apart, q2 moves at 22ms-1.
Assume the spheres are point charges, neglect gravity. What is the magnitude of the magnetic force of q2 on q1 when the spheres are 0.5m apart?

Homework Equations


F=qvB, I think...

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm a bit confused about why the magnetic force on the stationary sphere isn't zero. It isn't moving. There may be current in it as electrons are repelled by the approaching sphere, but if we're treating both as point charges this becomes irrelevant, doesn't it? So there's no reason it would feel magnetic force.

Even assuming it does feel a magnetic force, I have no idea which equation to use to find its magnitude. I don't know v or B at 0.5m apart!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
whatisreality said:
So there's no reason it would feel magnetic force.
In other words, the force is zero.

Weird sort of problem. You can still calculate the total force, which includes the electric component.

(I deleted your other thread as it is fully redundant to this one)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top