Magnetic vector potential from an infinite current sheet with thickness t

In summary: If so, then the integral would be a product of two integrals, one over the x-direction and one over the z-direction. And if you could solve for those integrals, you could probably solve for A in the end.In summary, the homework statement states that an infinite sheet of copper conductor, thickness t, lies in the xz-plane. The sides of the sheet intersect the y-axis at y=\pm\frac{t}{2}. The current density in the sheet is given by:{\bf{j}}({\bf{r}}) = \begin{cases}j_0\left(\frac{y}{t}\right)^2{\bf{\hat{
  • #1
superiority
12
0

Homework Statement


An infinite sheet of copper conductor, thickness t, lies in the xz-plane. The sides of the sheet intersect the y-axis at [itex]y=\pm\frac{t}{2}[/itex]. The current density in the sheet is given by:
[tex]{\bf{j}}({\bf{r}}) = \begin{cases}
j_0\left(\frac{y}{t}\right)^2{\bf{\hat{x}}}, & -\frac{t}{2} < y < \frac{t}{2} \\
0, & \textrm{elsewhere}
\end{cases}
[/tex]
Determine the magnetic vector potential A inside and outside the sheet and hence find B.

Homework Equations


[tex]\nabla^2A_x = \mu_0 j_x = j_0\left(\frac{y}{t}\right)^2[/tex]
[tex]\nabla^2A_y = \mu_0 j_y = 0[/tex]
[tex]\nabla^2A_z = \mu_0 j_z = 0[/tex]
[tex]\nabla \cdot {\bf{A}} = 0[/tex]
[tex]\nabla\times {\bf{A}} = {\bf{B}}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


I know the standard equation for finding magnetic vector potential is [itex]{\bf{A}}({\bf{r}}) = \frac{\mu_0}{4\pi}\int\frac{{\bf{j}}({\bf{r'}})}{|{\bf{r}}-{\bf{r'}}|} \,d\tau '[/itex], but that only applies when J goes to 0 at infinity. When the current is constant over an infinite region, it diverges.

I know that in calculating magnetic vector potential for an infinite wire, you can substitute in some finite limit c, calculate the integral, and then (I believe) take the limit as [itex]c\rightarrow\infty[/itex] and possibly add some constant term (allowed because of the freedom in A), but I can't figure out what the appropriate integral would be in this situation, or even if that same strategy would work at all. I'm not even sure which direction A would point (though B is fairly straightforward, I think: straight up at the edge on the positive y-side, diminishing as you move to infinity or to the origin, then changing direction and doing the same thing backwards).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Well you've written down the differential equations for A, so have you tried solving them?
 
  • #3
Okay, I need boundary conditions to find the solutions, right? I know that A is continuous everywhere. (Incidentally, I realized that I forgot to write [itex]\nabla^2{\bf{A}}_x = 0[/itex] outside the sheet). A is 0 at [itex]y = \infty[/itex]. So that gives me

[tex]\frac{\partial^2 A^{in}_x}{\partial x^2} + \frac{\partial^2 A^{in}_x}{\partial y^2} + \frac{\partial^2 A^{in}_x}{\partial z^2} = j_0\left(\frac{y}{t}\right)^2[/tex]
[tex]\frac{\partial^2 A^{in}_y}{\partial x^2} + \frac{\partial^2 A^{in}_y}{\partial y^2} + \frac{\partial^2 A^{in}_y}{\partial z^2} = 0[/tex]
[tex]\frac{\partial^2 A^{in}_z}{\partial x^2} + \frac{\partial^2 A^{in}_z}{\partial y^2} + \frac{\partial^2 A^{in}_z}{\partial z^2} = 0[/tex]
[tex]\frac{\partial^2 A^{out}_x}{\partial x^2} + \frac{\partial^2 A^{out}_x}{\partial y^2} + \frac{\partial^2 A^{out}_x}{\partial z^2} = 0[/tex]
[tex]\frac{\partial^2 A^{out}_y}{\partial x^2} + \frac{\partial^2 A^{out}_y}{\partial y^2} + \frac{\partial^2 A^{out}_y}{\partial z^2} = 0[/tex]
[tex]\frac{\partial^2 A^{out}_z}{\partial x^2} + \frac{\partial^2 A^{out}_z}{\partial y^2} + \frac{\partial^2 A^{out}_z}{\partial z^2} = 0[/tex]
[tex]\frac{\partial A^{in}_x}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial A^{in}_y}{\partial y} + \frac{\partial A^{in}_z}{\partial z} = 0[/tex]
[tex]\frac{\partial A^{out}_x}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial A^{out}_y}{\partial y} + \frac{\partial A^{out}_z}{\partial z} = 0[/tex]
[tex]{\bf{A}}^{in}\left(y = \tfrac{t}{2}\right) = {\bf{A}}^{out}\left(y = \tfrac{t}{2}\right)[/tex]
[tex]\lim_{y \to \infty}{\bf{A}}^{out}(y) = 0[/tex]

But the problem is that I don't actually know how to solve for the components of A from this point.
 
  • #4
In problems like these it pays enormously to think about the symmetries of your setup. You have a sheet which is infinite in the x and z directions. Would it make sense for the answer to depend on these coordinates?
 
  • #5


I would first start by breaking down the problem into smaller parts. The first step would be to determine the magnetic vector potential inside the sheet.

Using the given current density, we can solve the Laplace equation for the x-component of the magnetic vector potential, A_x, using the expression \nabla^2A_x = \mu_0 j_x. This gives us A_x = \frac{\mu_0 j_0}{6t^2}(y^3 - \frac{t^3}{2}) + c, where c is a constant of integration. We can then use the given boundary conditions at y = \pm\frac{t}{2} to solve for the constant c.

Next, we can use the fact that the magnetic vector potential is continuous at the boundary of the sheet (y = \pm\frac{t}{2}) to solve for the y-component of A, A_y. Since the current density is zero outside the sheet, A_y must also be zero outside the sheet. Therefore, we only need to solve for A_y inside the sheet, which can be done using the Laplace equation \nabla^2A_y = \mu_0 j_y = 0. This gives us A_y = c_1x + c_2z, where c_1 and c_2 are constants of integration. Again, we can use the boundary conditions to solve for these constants.

Finally, we can use the fact that the magnetic vector potential must be divergence-free (\nabla \cdot {\bf{A}} = 0) to solve for the z-component of A, A_z. Since A_z must also be zero outside the sheet, we only need to solve for A_z inside the sheet using the Laplace equation \nabla^2A_z = \mu_0 j_z = 0. This gives us A_z = -\frac{\mu_0 j_0}{6t^2}(y^3 - \frac{t^3}{2}) + c_3, where c_3 is a constant of integration. Again, we can use the boundary conditions to solve for this constant.

Now that we have determined the magnetic vector potential inside the sheet, we can use the expression \nabla \times {\bf{A}} = {\bf{B}} to calculate the magnetic field, B. This gives us B =
 

1. What is the formula for calculating the magnetic vector potential from an infinite current sheet with thickness t?

The formula for calculating the magnetic vector potential from an infinite current sheet with thickness t is A = μ0I/2π * ln[(r + √(r^2 + t^2))/t], where μ0 is the permeability of free space, I is the current, r is the distance from the current sheet, and t is the thickness of the sheet.

2. How does the thickness of the current sheet affect the magnetic vector potential?

The thickness of the current sheet directly affects the magnetic vector potential. As the thickness increases, the potential decreases, and vice versa. This is because a thicker current sheet results in a larger distance between the current sheet and the point where the potential is being calculated, leading to a weaker magnetic field and lower potential.

3. Can the magnetic vector potential from an infinite current sheet be negative?

No, the magnetic vector potential from an infinite current sheet cannot be negative. It is always a positive value as it represents the energy required to move a unit magnetic pole from infinity to a certain point in space.

4. What is the direction of the magnetic vector potential from an infinite current sheet?

The direction of the magnetic vector potential from an infinite current sheet is perpendicular to the current sheet and follows the right-hand rule. This means that if the current is flowing in the positive z-direction, the potential will point in the positive direction of the x-axis.

5. Does the magnetic vector potential depend on the distance from the current sheet?

Yes, the magnetic vector potential is directly proportional to the distance from the current sheet. As the distance increases, the potential decreases, and vice versa. This is because the magnetic field strength decreases with distance from the current sheet, and the potential is a measure of the strength of the magnetic field.

Similar threads

  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
44
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
376
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top