Solving Magnetism Question: What Current & Direction is Needed?

  • Thread starter Thread starter adwlacrosse75
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Magnetism
AI Thread Summary
To achieve zero tension in the supporting wires of a conductor with a mass per unit length of 0.0500 kg/m in a magnetic field of 3.70 T, the magnetic force must equal the weight of the conductor. The weight can be expressed as the product of mass per unit length and length, allowing for a variable representation. The magnetic force on the conductor is calculated using the formula F = BILsin(theta), where B is the magnetic field strength, I is the current, and L is the length of the conductor. The direction of the current must be determined based on the right-hand rule to ensure the magnetic force opposes the weight. Understanding these relationships is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
adwlacrosse75
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
A conductor suspended by two flexible wires as shown in Figure P19.18 has a mass per unit length of 0.0500 kg/m.

Figure P19.18 (The picture is an attachment)

What current must exist in the conductor for the tension in the supporting wires to be zero when the magnetic field is 3.70 T into the page?

What is the required direction for the current?

Thanks a lot guys I'm new to the board and looking for some help. I appreciate it!
 

Attachments

  • p19-18.gif
    p19-18.gif
    9.7 KB · Views: 453
Physics news on Phys.org
What have you done so far?

How do you find the magnetic force on a current-carrying wire?
 
Magnetic force on a current carrying conductor/wire

F=B(magnetic field)I(Current)L(Length)sin(theta)

I have no idea where to start can you help me out here or just get me started.

Whats throwing me off is this mass per unit length and the tension
 
adwlacrosse75 said:
Whats throwing me off is this mass per unit length and the tension
The mass per unit length will help you find the weight of the conductor.

In order for there to be zero tension in the support wires, what must the net force be on the conductor?
 
well for there to be zero tension in the support wires the net force should just be the opposite of the weight just like a bouyant force on a floating object. But if I don't have a length how can i get the weight of the object. I think that's the exact thing that's screwing me up.
 
adwlacrosse75 said:
well for there to be zero tension in the support wires the net force should just be the opposite of the weight just like a bouyant force on a floating object.
That's not exactly right. (I think you're on the right track--you're just describing it incorrectly.) What two forces act on the conductor?
But if I don't have a length how can i get the weight of the object. I think that's the exact thing that's screwing me up.
Maybe you don't need an actual value. :wink: Hint: Just call the length L and see what happens.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top