Magnitude of a Net Charge within a closed surface

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the net charge enclosed by a closed surface in a nonuniform electric field, described by Gauss's Law. The user initially calculates the net flux through the surface but mistakenly adds the fluxes from both sides instead of subtracting them, as the electric field vectors are oriented differently. After clarification, it is noted that the flux from the side aligned with the electric field is positive, while the opposing side's flux is negative. The correct approach involves subtracting the negative flux from the positive one to find the net charge. Ultimately, the user successfully resolves the confusion and arrives at the correct solution.
fisixC
Messages
54
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A closed surface with dimensions a = b =
0.254 m and c = 0.4064 m is located as in
the figure. The electric field throughout the
region is nonuniform and given by ~E = (α +
β x^2)ˆı where x is in meters, α = 4 N/C, and
β = 6 N/(C m2).

Picture of object attached.

What is the magnitude of the net charge
enclosed by the surface?
Answer in units of C.

Homework Equations



Gauss's Law: Flux = integral(E dA) = Q/permittivity constant

permittivity constant(epsilon naught) = 8.85E-12

The Attempt at a Solution



I know that the object doesn't not have any flux through any of the sides except the left and right sides(those parallel to the electric field). So I thought to find net flux and multiply that by the permittivity constant and find the net charge enclosed.

Flux1 = (α +β (a+c)^2)*(a*b) = Electric field * area of the side(right)
Flux2 = (α +β (a)^2) * (a*b) = Electric field * area of the other side(left)

Then:
Flux1 + Flux2 = 0.709925351759
Therefore I multiply by epsilon naught:
net flux * epsilon naught = 6.28283939307E-12

However this is wrong, I believe I am messing up because of the weird way they are giving the electric field as, or possibly my entire calculations or process?
 

Attachments

  • gauss'slawprob.JPG
    gauss'slawprob.JPG
    23.2 KB · Views: 955
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone, please help.
 
Are you sure you should be adding the fluxes? Knowing that flux is the integral of E dotted into dA, what can you say about the flux for either side?
 
I figured it out I needed to subtract the positive flux from the negative flux. Right side - left side.
 
Right. Do you know why?
 
  • Like
Likes idkjayesh
Yes because the area vector is going the same direction as the electric field vector on the right but on the left the area and electric field vectors are going opposite directions.
 
Excellent. Keep at the physics! It only gets more fun from where you are, trust me.
 
For one of the sides the normal to that side is antiparallel to the field lines (opposite direction), while for the other side the normal is parallel to it. Thus one flux should have a negative value.

EDIT: Well, I see I'm a bit late to the party. Glad to see you worked it out!
 
Back
Top