Magnitude of an Electric field on a point by 2 charged spheres

[KayleighK]

Homework Statement

The left-hand sphere has a positive charge Q and the right-hand sphere has a negative charge -Q . Charge is distibuted uniformly over each of two spherical volumes with radius R. One sphere of charge is centered at the origin and the other at x=2R .
Find the magnitude of the net electric field at the point R/2 on the x-axis

Homework Equations

E=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}} (\frac{Q}{R^{2}}

The Attempt at a Solution

Since the point is located within the first sphere, I thought the electric field would be zero.
Then I typed in:

E=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}} (\frac{Q}{\frac{3}{2}R^{2}}

but it said the answer was wrong. Can anyone please help?

 

[rl.bhat]

Since the point is located within the first sphere, I thought the electric field would be zero.

But the sphere is not a conductor. So the field inside a uniformly charge sphere the is not equal to zero.

 

[KayleighK]

Since the point is located within the first sphere, I thought the electric field would be zero.

But the sphere is not a conductor. So the field inside a uniformly charge sphere the is not equal to zero.

Oh ok, so then the E field for the first sphere would be:

\frac{1}{4_{0}\epsilon\pi}\frac{Q}{\frac{1}{2}R^{2}}

And then since both fields of the spheres are pointing the same direction I will just add the E fields of the first sphere with the second sphere?

 

[ideasrule]

Oh ok, so then the E field for the first sphere would be:

\frac{1}{4_{0}\epsilon\pi}\frac{Q}{\frac{1}{2}R^{2}}

Why? The shell theorem states that the part of the sphere from r=1/2R to R creates no net electric field. The sphere "under" that shell has radius 1/2R, so what charge must it have?

 

[KayleighK]

Why? The shell theorem states that the part of the sphere from r=1/2R to R creates no net electric field. The sphere "under" that shell has radius 1/2R, so what charge must it have?

Would it have half the charge it originally had? Q/2?

 

[ideasrule]

Would it? How much of the original volume does the smaller sphere have?

 

[KayleighK]

Would it? How much of the original volume does the smaller sphere have?

It would have 1/8 less volume...so then Q/8

 

[KayleighK]

Ok, I finally understand the problem now. Thank you so much for your help! I appreciate it =)