Magnitude of average velocity and average speed

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating average velocity and average speed for an electron's motion. The correct approach for average speed involves summing the total distance traveled and dividing it by the total time elapsed, rather than using the difference in time intervals. For average velocity, the net displacement should be calculated by subtracting the distances traveled in opposite directions, as they are not perpendicular vectors. The importance of visualizing the motion with a diagram is emphasized to clarify the problem. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurate calculations in one-dimensional motion scenarios.
J.live
Messages
95
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An electron moves in the positive x-direction a distance of 2.44 m in 3.10 *10-8 s, bounces off a moving proton, and then moves in the opposite direction a distance of 1.68 m in 3.53*10-8 s.



The Attempt at a Solution



to find the average velocity I used the distance formula to find magnitude divide it by the c

Sqrt (2.44)^2+(1.68)^2 / (3.53*10^8 - 3.10*10^8) ?


for the average speed

(2.44 - 1.68) / (3.53*10^8 - 3.10*10^8)?


Can someone explain it by showing some work? I keep getting the wrong answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
J.live said:
for the average speed

(2.44 - 1.68) / (3.53*10^8 - 3.10*10^8)?


Can someone explain it by showing some work? I keep getting the wrong answer.

This part is wrong for sure. The average speed would be the total distance traveled (without regard for direction) divided by the total time elapsed. The total time elapsed would be the SUM of the two time intervals, not the difference between them, right?
 
As for the first part of the question, your method for finding the net displacement is also wrong. That Pythagorean distance formula you used does not apply, because the two vectors aren't perpendicular. They are anti-parallel (meaning one is in the +x direction, and one is in the -x direction). So they lie along the same line, making this effectively a 1D problem. To add up the two vectors, all you end up having to do is subtract the two distances. Draw a picture and you'll see what I mean.

A more intuitive way to arrive at that answer is to think about what the net displacement actually means physically: it is how far from its starting point the particle ends up.

My comment about the time interval also applies here as well.
 
Thank you.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top