Man on the end of a beam (rotational equilibrium problem)

  • Thread starter Thread starter heatherwebb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beam Equilibrium
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a rotational equilibrium problem involving a man standing on a beam supported at two points. The man weighs 800 Newtons, while the beam itself weighs 225 Newtons, with one support exerting 600 Newtons upward. Participants emphasize the importance of drawing a free body diagram to visualize forces and distances, and they discuss using torque equations to determine the man's position relative to the supports. There is a suggestion to define upward forces as positive to simplify calculations. Ultimately, the solution hinges on correctly applying the torque equation to find the man's distance from the left support without needing the force from that support.
heatherwebb
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


1. If a man weighing 800 Newtons is standing on a uniform beam an unknown distance from the supports. The beam is of length 5m and weighs 225 Newtons, and one support is positioned at the left end of the beam, the other is placed 1m from the left end and is exerting 600 Newtons up upon the beam. (http://heatherwebb.com/rotationalequilibriumdiagram.jpg - I did the parts in red)

a) Draw the free body diagram on the given picture, show all forces, known and unknown, along with all distances.

b) If the beam is in equilibrium, what distance is the man standing from the left support?



Homework Equations


Torque (left support) = Torque (man)


The Attempt at a Solution


Here is the diagram and what I've done to it, http://heatherwebb.com/rotationalequilibriumdiagram.jpg .
I know that the pivot exerts a force of 600N. Isn't that the normal force? Shouldn't I use that and the two known forces to determine the force at the left-most support? Then use that in the Torque equation?
It's not making sense to me because the force of the left-most support comes out to be negative.


The Attempt at a Solution


 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The drawing is correct. (The person could be at some place on the beam, not necessarily at the end).

I've worked out the force from the left-most support, and it is upwards. Maybe you mis-calculated? The best way to do it would be to define up as positive, so then all upward forces are positive and all downward forces are negative. Then all the forces added together should equal zero.

And yes, you're right that you need to use torque equation to see where the person must stand for there to be zero total torque. But actually, you don't need to know the force exerted by the left-most support to find this. Remember you can define the torque around any point, so what point will make this calculation easiest?
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top