Many-worlds, Schroedinger, Heisenberg pictures

atyy
Science Advisor
Messages
15,170
Reaction score
3,379
I've usually heard the many-worlds interpretation described in the Schroedinger picture, in which the wave function evolves unitarily. Does a Heisenberg picture exist for many-worlds, or is the Schroedinger picture more fundamental in that interpretation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the many-world interpretation of non-relativistic QM, the Schrodinger picture is certainly more fundamental than the Heisenberg one.
But this is not really so in canonical quantum gravity, where the two pictures are identical.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Demystifier said:
In the many-world interpretation of non-relativistic QM, the Schrodinger picture is certainly more fundamental than the Heisenberg one.
But this is not really so in canonical quantum gravity, where the two pictures are identical.

Because there is no time evolution in canonical quantum gravity (time evolution is a gauge transformation)?
 
atyy said:
Because there is no time evolution in canonical quantum gravity (time evolution is a gauge transformation)?
Yes.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
How about relativistic QFT? Or do you think MWI doesn't satisfactorily address that, because MWI seems to pick a preferred foliation?

Also, how about canonical quantum gravity in AdS? I think canonical quantum gravity in AdS has time evolution (I think the Hamiltonian is not zero because of the AdS boundary condition, which is one of the reasons AdS/CFT is possible, since the bulk inherits its time evolution from the boundary CFT).
 
atyy said:
How about relativistic QFT?
In relativistic QFT Heisenberg and Schrodinger pictures are different, so Schrodinger picture is the preferred one for MWI.

The question of relativistic covariance is a separate issue. It can be made covariant by using many-time formalism.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
I would like to know the validity of the following criticism of one of Zeilinger's latest papers https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.07756 "violation of bell inequality with unentangled photons" The review is by Francis Villatoro, in Spanish, https://francis.naukas.com/2025/07/26/sin-entrelazamiento-no-se-pueden-incumplir-las-desigualdades-de-bell/ I will translate and summarize the criticism as follows: -It is true that a Bell inequality is violated, but not a CHSH inequality. The...
I understand that the world of interpretations of quantum mechanics is very complex, as experimental data hasn't completely falsified the main deterministic interpretations (such as Everett), vs non-deterministc ones, however, I read in online sources that Objective Collapse theories are being increasingly challenged. Does this mean that deterministic interpretations are more likely to be true? I always understood that the "collapse" or "measurement problem" was how we phrased the fact that...
This is not, strictly speaking, a discussion of interpretations per se. We often see discussions based on QM as it was understood during the early days and the famous Einstein-Bohr debates. The problem with this is that things in QM have advanced tremendously since then, and the 'weirdness' that puzzles those attempting to understand QM has changed. I recently came across a synopsis of these advances, allowing those interested in interpretational issues to understand the modern view...
Back
Top