Stargazing Mars' orbital telescope and ice rock

AI Thread Summary
A Mars orbital telescope could provide high-resolution geological views, potentially revealing stromatolytic fossils and ice formations that resemble lightweight rock. There is speculation that ancient Martian ice may appear opaque and rock-like, raising questions about the presence of ice rock on the surface. Current meteorite samples from Mars have not confirmed the existence of water. The discussion also suggests the feasibility of similar telescopes for lunar exploration to identify rock ice and enhance geological databases. Overall, advanced imaging technology could significantly improve our understanding of both Mars and the Moon's geology.
cph
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
Might one place a telescope in Mars orbit, in order to obtain 6" to 1 ft resolution, looking for closeup geological views; such as mars' stromatolytic fossils, or mars' ice (rock) on the surface, in form of a smooth surface that seems a bit odd? Might billions year old Mars' ice be opaque to light, and take on the appearance of rock, but very light weight rock? So is there mars' ice rock on the surface? Do any of the Mars meteroites on Earth have in part Mars rock ice?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
cph said:
Might one place a telescope in Mars orbit, in order to obtain 2 mm resolution, looking for closeup geological views; such as mars' stromatolytic fossils, or mars' ice (rock) on the surface, in form of a smooth surface that seems a bit odd? Might billions year old Mars' ice be opaque to light, and take on the appearance of rock, but very light weight rock? So is there mars' ice rock on the surface? Do any of the Mars meteroites on Earth have in part Mars rock ice?

As noted 2 mm resolution (that of a field geologist) would be better. Also placing a Moon orbiter (rover-like) with a telescope, looking for Moon rock ice etc. For example, what appears to be a rock effacement, might continue into mottled appearance for near to reflected light. Thus a geological data base at 2mm resolution also for the Moon; equivalent to placing a geologist on the Moon.
 
cph said:
As noted 2 mm resolution (that of a field geologist) would be better. Also placing a Moon orbiter (rover-like) with a telescope, looking for Moon rock ice etc. For example, what appears to be a rock effacement, might continue into mottled appearance for near to reflected light. Such mottled appearance might be considered the definative sign of so-called rock ice. Thus a geological data base at 2mm resolution also for the Moon; equivalent to placing a geologist on the Moon.

Likewise one could put such rover orbiter, with 2mm resolution, for earth. Thus allowing for exploration of remote areas, such as east of Ural mts. Also perhaps useful for anthropological exploration for fossils in remote fields.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
18
Views
7K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
8K
Back
Top