Marx Generator Capacitance and Charge Storing Question

AI Thread Summary
A Marx generator functions by cascading capacitor discharges to achieve a final voltage that is a multiple of the initial voltage. The final capacitors, typically represented by a spark gap, act as a switch rather than storage devices, allowing the discharge to occur through a load. However, it is possible to modify the setup to store charge instead of discharging it, provided that adequate insulation and switching mechanisms are in place. The discussion also highlights the need for reliable resources, as users seek recommendations for books on Marx generators. Overall, the Marx generator can be adapted for charge storage with the right modifications.
JAlexander
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I have had a question on my mind that a generic google search has so far been unable to answer for me. I know that marx generators multiple voltage by cascading capacitor discharges so that you get a final voltage of n x Vinit - where n is number of capacitors and Vinit is your initial voltage.

In all videos and discussions I have seen, that final voltage gets discharged across the final capacitors - implying that just as the initial capacitors discharged, the final capacitors must also discharge in like manner.

My question is, if you did not want a final discharge, but instead wanted to store charge, is a marx generator capable of doing this? Or must the final capacitors discharge after cascading through the initial capacitors?

In other words, If I have two parallel plates rather than the little balls that you see for the final capacitors, and my final voltage at the end of n x Vint equals 20KV, can those parallel plates store the charge or no?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I think you mistake the purpose of the pairs of spheres. These are not capacitors, but a switch. The generator charges the capacitors in parallel, then these are connected in series across the load via the pair of balls. These balls form a spark gap. One if them might be attached to a swing arm or some other device, used to enable an arc to form between them. This arc then discharges the series connected capacitors through the load. The nonlinear properties of the arc help to shape the waveform if the discharge.
The spark gap switch is used because a regular switch would be damaged by the high violtages and currents involved in the discharge.
 
JAlexander said:
My question is, if you did not want a final discharge, but instead wanted to store charge, is a marx generator capable of doing this?

Yes it is (if you have adequate cap-to-cap switches and insulation level everywhere)
 
Thanks for the info, zoki. That is what I was looking for.

Can anyone recommend a good book on the topic of marx generators? Google searches aren't really cutting it.

-Thanks
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top