Mass Bending Space: Theories Explored

  • Thread starter Thread starter brian44cali
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bend Mass Space
brian44cali
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
It seems obvious to me that mass isn't just bending space but it's essentially bent space. Have any previous theories shown this before?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you mean by that?
 
DaleSpam said:
What do you mean by that?


To put it metaphorically: Space is a web and mass is just the pulling and clumping of that web.
 
Well that's the trouble with metaphors. Metaphors make something complex seem simpler, but that doesn't mean that one can take the simple model and interpolate properties into the complex model.

Which is why theories don't deal with metaphors.
 
brian44cali said:
To put it metaphorically: Space is a web and mass is just the pulling and clumping of that web.
What do you mean by that.
 
Mass is NOT spacetime (rather, it is extremely compact energy), though if I remember correctly they are dependent on each other for existence.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Replies
58
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
81
Views
9K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Back
Top