Mass conservation for pulsating sphere

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the mass conservation equation for a pulsating sphere with thickness dr. Key points include confusion over the physical meaning of multiplying the sphere's area by the pulsation speed and density to obtain mass. There is also uncertainty regarding the substitution of ρ with ρ' on the left-hand side of the equation. Clarifications are requested about the assumptions of spherical symmetry and the nature of the time derivative used in the equation. The equation of continuity is suggested as a starting point for further analysis.
enc08
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm trying to understand the mass conservation equation for a pulsating sphere which has thickness dr. Please refer to the attached solution.

\rho = \rho_{0} (ambient density) + \rho' (small deviation)

There are two things I don't follow.

First, is that to obtain the mass, the area of the sphere is multiplied by the speed (and density) at which it is pulsating. Although the units work out, I don't see the physical meaning behind taking the product with speed :confused:.

Secondly, on the LHS, the ρ turns into a ρ'. I can't see how this substitution was made.

Thanks for your input!
 

Attachments

  • Capture.JPG
    Capture.JPG
    15.5 KB · Views: 434
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not clear what you mean by "pulsating sphere." What changes and what stays the same? It looks like the density is changing. The drawing makes it look like the sphere is a shell with inside radius r and outside radius r + dr.

Can you make things a bit more clear?
 
The equation 1) mentioned in your figure doesn't look correct. It may be tentatively correct if the time derivative on the left hand side (L.H.S.) is really a total time derivative and not a partial time derivative(as indicated in the figure) and the deviations of the density are assumed to be sufficiently small.
Also apparently spherical symmetry appears to have been assumed for the density and the velocity.
If you want to figure things out for yourself you can start out with the equation of continuity:
\nabla.(\rho\bar{v}) = -\frac{\partial\rho}{\partial t}
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top