I Mass for solving the nuclear energy level

just_mb
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi all,
I'm trying to solve a problem of finite square well for the ##s## states graphically. The task is to find energy levels and wavefunctions of proton in a spherically symmetric potential, first for deuteron then ##^{48}Ca##. What makes me confused is the mass. For deuteron, the mass used is the reduced mass because it's a two-masses system. Using that, the energy from my calculation is similar to that from literature. But what about the ##^{48}Ca##, what mass should I use? When I use reduced mass of ##m_{proton}(19 \times m_{proton} + 28 \times m_{neutron})/(20 \times m_{proton} + 28 \times m_{neutron})## which I found from a literature, the energies don't match with realistic Skyrme Hartree Fock calculations (figure attached). When I use the total mass ##(20 \times m_{proton} + 28 \times m_{neutron})##, I found 7 ##s## energy levels as oppose to 2, as shown in the figure. Please help me, I have been searching through tons of books and journals with no luck.

Screen Shot 2019-07-07 at 11.54.03 am.png
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Use the reduced mass, or the proton mass - they are nearly the same for larger nuclei.
It is hard to tell what went wrong if you don't show your results.
 
  • Like
Likes just_mb
mfb said:
Use the reduced mass, or the proton mass - they are nearly the same for larger nuclei.
It is hard to tell what went wrong if you don't show your results.
Thanks. That's what I used and this is the graphical solutions that I got.
246252

where ##\xi## is given by $$\xi = \sqrt{\frac{2m(V_0 - |E|)}{\hbar^2}}a$$ where ##V_0 = 45 \, MeV##, and ##a = ½A^⅓ = 4.36\, fm##. As shown in the graph, the solutions are ##\xi = 2.702## and ##5.298## which according to the equation above correspond to ##E = 1.04\, MeV## and ##13.73\, MeV##. The coulomb energy for ##^{48}Ca## is ##75\, MeV##. If I substract those energies by Coulomb energy, the results are nowhere near those in Skyrme Hartree Fock calculations. What's wrong with my calculation?
 

Attachments

  • 1562501890608.png
    1562501890608.png
    7.3 KB · Views: 287
It is still not very clear what you did, and it is surprising that you only found two solutions.

Is this part of some textbook problem (so you know this approach should give a useful answer)?
 
mfb said:
It is still not very clear what you did, and it is surprising that you only found two solutions.
Only the ##s## states need to be solved so I think there are only two solutions, as suggested by Skyrme Hartree Fock calculations. I am also confused with that solution. In the picture, for example, the ##0s1## state of protons only differ by about 1 MeV from that of neutrons. The difference is caused by Coulomb energy. But from my calculation, the Coulomb energy is 75 MeV. Am I understanding it correctly? Can you please explain this to me?

mfb said:
Is this part of some textbook problem (so you know this approach should give a useful answer)?
No, it's not. But we follow the guides from Quantum Mechanics by Schiff.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top