Mass moment of inertia of a composite shape

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the mass moment of inertia (MMoI) of a composite shape, the rectangle's MMoI is determined first, followed by the quarter circle's MMoI. The parallel axis theorem must be applied twice to find the MMoI of the quarter circle about the x-axis, starting from its centroid. It's suggested to find the MMoI of each simple piece separately and then sum them, rather than finding the centroid of the entire shape first. The discussion emphasizes the importance of considering units and the need to account for thickness and density after determining the combined centroid. Understanding these calculations is crucial for accurately determining the MMoI of composite shapes.
marcadams267
Messages
19
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
What is the mass moment of inertia (kg-m^2) of the following steel plate about the x-axis
Relevant Equations
Mass moment of inertia of a quarter circular plate about its base is (1/4)mr^2
Mass moment of inertia of a rectangle along its base about the x-axis is(1/3)mh^2
thickness of the steel plate is 5mm
density of steel is 7850 kg/m^3
figure.png

My thought process was to get the mass moment of inertia of the rectangle and then subtract the mass moment of inertia of the quartercircle from it.
The MMoI of the rectangle is:
(1/3)(0.005*7850*.6*.3)(.3^2)= 0.212 meters
The MMoI of the quartercircle is:
(1/4)(0.005*7850*¼π 0.3^2)(.3^2) + ?
My problem is that I'm not sure how to apply the parallel axis theorem to get the Mass moment of inertia of the quarter circle about the x-axis.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
marcadams267 said:
The MMoI of the rectangle is:
(1/3)(0.005*7850*.6*.3)(.3^2)= 0.212 meters

My problem is that I'm not sure how to apply the parallel axis theorem to get the Mass moment of inertia of the quarter circle about the x-axis.
Pay attention to units.

To use the parallel axis theorem you need to know where the mass centre is.
 
  • Like
Likes marcadams267
I understand now, since I only know the mass moment of inertia about the base of the quartercircle, I first have to use this to find its mass moment of inertia about its centroid. Then I use this mass moment about the centroid to find the mass moment of inertia about the x-axis.
I have to apply the parallel axis theorem twice.
 
marcadams267 said:
I understand now, since I only know the mass moment of inertia about the base of the quartercircle, I first have to use this to find its mass moment of inertia about its centroid. Then I use this mass moment about the centroid to find the mass moment of inertia about the x-axis.
I have to apply the parallel axis theorem twice.
Yes.
I looked for a way to avoid this in the present case by using some symmetry arguments, but failed.
 
Lnewqban said:
Take a look at problem #2 of this site:
https://owlcation.com/stem/How-to-Solve-Centroids-of-Compound-Shapes

I would leave the inclusion of the thickness and density of the material for after finding the combined centroid of the irregular flat shape.
I would not recommend to find the centroid of the entire lamina. For moments of inertia of compound shapes it is almost always simpler to find the MoI of each simple piece separately and sum. So here I would find the centroid of a semicircle, hence find the MoI of a semicircle about a tangent, etc.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top