Mass of a star given orbital radius and period

AI Thread Summary
To find the mass of a star based on the orbital radius and period of a planet, one can use the principles of circular motion and gravitational forces. The centripetal force acting on the planet can be expressed as (mv^2)/r, where v is the orbital velocity. The relationship between the orbital period, mass, and radius can be derived from Kepler's third law, which allows for the calculation of the star's mass without needing the planet's mass, as it is negligible in comparison. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the relevant forces and equations to solve the problem effectively. Overall, applying these concepts will lead to the desired solution for the star's mass.
disque
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In recent years, a number of nearby stars have been found to possesses planets. Suppose, the orbital radius of such a planet is found to be 4.3 times 1011 m, with a period of 1080 days. Find the mass of the star.


Homework Equations


?


The Attempt at a Solution


I don't even know where to start with this question. Without the mass of the planet I am clueless. ANy help would be much appreciated, Thanks a lot.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
disque said:

Homework Statement


In recent years, a number of nearby stars have been found to possesses planets. Suppose, the orbital radius of such a planet is found to be 4.3 times 1011 m, with a period of 1080 days. Find the mass of the star.


Homework Equations


?


The Attempt at a Solution


I don't even know where to start with this question. Without the mass of the planet I am clueless. ANy help would be much appreciated, Thanks a lot.
Let's start by looking at what interactions are relevant. So erm what are the relevant interactions? Or more to the point, what forces are acting on our planet?
After that we'll need to see what the motion of the planet means in terms of forces. So again can you think of a relation between the period, mass and radius for an object in circular motion to the force exerted on it?
after that we should be at a point to get an answer after a bit of algebra
 
(mv^2)/r
am i on the right track?
 
disque said:
(mv^2)/r
am i on the right track?

So that's the equation for the centripetal force, you will need to relate v to the period and radius. Also you need to recognize what force is causing the circular motion and what the equation for that force is
 
Look up "Kepler's third law" in the index of your book. You are given numbers to substitute into the formula.
 
I'm surprised they've not covered Kepler's laws first? Did you skip a chapter?

Seems a little advanced to expect you to know how to find mass without it?

You don't really need to know the mass of the planet since it will be much smaller than the star generally so you can approximate it ignoring the planets mass to all intents and purposes.

Even Jupiter's mass is only ~1/1000 of the Suns.
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
8K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
5K
Back
Top