Mass on a Stick Model: Solve for Realistic Results

  • Thread starter Thread starter Integral
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Model
AI Thread Summary
A mathematical model was developed for a mass at the end of a stick pivoting about a fixed point, incorporating torque, moment of inertia, and forces from an air cylinder. The equations involved included torque calculations based on the angle between the cylinder and the pivot arm, as well as relationships derived from the law of sines and cosines. Initial simulations using the English measurement system yielded incorrect results due to a misunderstanding of mass and force units. The issue was resolved by switching to the metric system, leading to accurate simulations. The discussion highlights the importance of consistent units in mathematical modeling for accurate results.
Integral
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
7,226
Reaction score
66
I have need of a mathematical model of a mass at the end of a stick, pivoting about the opposite end. What I have done so far is not giving realistic results, would appreciate it if some one could point out my error.

Basic model :

\tau = I \ddot {\theta}

I = m r^2

The system is being pushed by an air cylinder (force F) with the fixed end mounted a distance L directly below the pivot, the moving end of the cylinder is mounted a distance r along the pivot arm from the pivot point. With \phi the angle between the cylinder and the pivot arm. So I have :

\tau = r F sin( \phi)

My variable of interest will be the angle between the pivot arm and the line defined by the pivot and the fixed end of the cylinder, call this angle \theta

By the law of sines I get

\frac {Sin(\phi)} {L} = \frac {sin(\theta)} {x}
where x is the length of the cylinder.

I get x in terms of \theta from the law of cosines

x^2 = L^2 + r^2 -2lr cos(\theta)

The differential equation is:

\ddot{ \theta } = \frac { \tau } {I}

See the attachment for a diagram.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, The above model is correct. For the last week I have been running this through an excel spreadsheet using a Runga Kutta method, the results were not correct, the system simply did not respond the way I KNEW it should.

My error? using the fricking English measurement system. I was using lbs where I needed slugs. So I was throwing 32 times the mass I thought I was. That sort of slowed things down. I finally made the simulation work by changing everything to metric, Newtons for force, kg for mass and meters everywhere, It worked great. It was then that I seriously began to figure out the lbs mass lbs force issue.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top