Mass-Spring Oscillation question

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mozart
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Oscillation
AI Thread Summary
A block hanging from a vertical spring experiences an 8.00 cm sag when a second identical block is added. The user initially calculated the oscillation frequency using incorrect assumptions about mass and spring constant. After guidance, they realized that the total mass of the two-block system should be used in the frequency formula. The correct approach involves finding the spring constant in terms of mass, displacement, and gravitational acceleration. This clarification helped the user understand their mistake and correctly solve the problem.
Mozart
Messages
106
Reaction score
0
I tried to work out this problem a few different ways but I never get the right answer.

A block hangs in equilibrium from a vertical spring. When a second identical block is added, the original block sags by 8.00 cm

What is the oscillation frequency of the two-block system?

What I've done so far:

Attempt 1:

(Fnet)y=-ky
2mg=-ky
m=((-ky)/(2g))

Then using T=2pi times sqaure root[m/k]

puting in my m as what I found in terms of k, y, and g. The K's cancel and I am left with things I know and then calculate to find my T it turns out to be 0.40 seconds

and then I finish off my problem with freqency= 1/period and get 2.5 Hz

But this is incorrect.

I probably made a wrong assumption but I can't put my finger on it. I hope someone can put me on the right track.

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mozart said:
What I've done so far:

Attempt 1:

(Fnet)y=-ky
2mg=-ky
m=((-ky)/(2g))
What you want to do is find the spring constant in terms of m, y, & g. Assuming that y is the additional displacement from equilibrium, then:
mg = ky (since one block is added)

Then using T=2pi times sqaure root[m/k]
What mass goes here? (The system has two blocks now.)
 
Thank you! That worked perfectly. I understand where I made my mistake now too.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top