Mass, Volume, Density work with a Sphere

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the mass of a spherical shell with given dimensions and densities. The mass function is defined as m = 399.33 - 4.79 pi (a^3) grams, where 'a' is the inside radius. It is concluded that to maximize mass, 'a' should be minimized, ideally approaching zero. This leads to the understanding that as 'a' decreases, the mass 'm' increases, reaching its maximum when 'a' is at its smallest possible value. The conversation highlights the importance of formulating relationships between variables to solve for maximum values effectively.
jdsconsumer
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
A spherical shell has an outside radius of 2.75 cm and an inside radius of a. The shell wall has uniform thickness and is made of a material with density 4.59 g/cm3. The space inside the shell is filled with a liquid having a density of 1.00 g/cm3. (a) Find the mass m of the sphere, including its contents, as a function of a.

Answer that I got much help on from previous helpers: m = 399.33 - 4.79 pi ( a^3 ) grams

(b) For what value of a does m have its maximum possible value?

(c) What is this maximum mass?

(d) Explain whether the value from part (c) agrees with the result of a direct calculation of the mass of a solid sphere of uniform density made of the same material as the shell.

I am now on part (b). So am I trying to find the maximum of that function of "a"?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Is there any other
equation between a and m If you can tell me then I can help you
 
jdsconsumer said:
find the maximum of that function of "a"
According to the equation, if you increase a what happens to m?
 
haruspex said:
According to the equation, if you increase a what happens to m?

uhm, if a increases it looks like m will get smaller, right?
 
ArmanCham said:
Is there any other
equation between a and m If you can tell me then I can help you

No other equation that is given to me. I think we have to formulate our own...
 
jdsconsumer said:
uhm, if a increases it looks like m will get smaller, right?
Right. And if you decrease a?
 
jbriggs444 said:
Right. And if you decrease a?

Then m would get larger.
 
So if you want to maximize m, what must you do with a?
 
jbriggs444 said:
So if you want to maximize m, what must you do with a?

make it smaller and smaller until I can't make it any smaller? So if I reduced it to 0, the minimum it's radius could be, then m couldn't get any larger at that point. At least from the decrement of a.
 
  • #10
Yup. There you go.
 
  • #11
jbriggs444 said:
Yup. There you go.

You are awesome, I love how you did that for me! Incredible!
Thank you, jbriggs444!
 
  • #12
grrr, why was that so hard for me to talk through on my own?! That is awesome! I feel so much better now!
 
Back
Top