Masses Connected By Strings May Be Treated as Rigid Bodies?

AI Thread Summary
Two masses connected by a massless string can be treated as a single mass when a tension force acts on the system, allowing for simplified calculations. In a scenario with three blocks connected by massless strings on a frictionless surface, the same principle applies, as all blocks will have the same acceleration when the strings are taut. The problem involves finding the tension in the strings based on the masses of the blocks, the tension in the rightmost string, and the uniform acceleration. Newton's 2nd law is applicable to the chosen system, whether treating the blocks as a single entity or individually. This approach facilitates solving for tensions and accelerations in the system.
breez
Messages
65
Reaction score
0
Say you have 2 masses connected by a massless string, and another massless string is connected to the rightmost mass. A tension force T acts along this rightmost string, resulting in the string connecting the 2 masses to become taunt.

In these cases, you can treat the 2 masses as one mass whose total mass is the sum of the 2 masses correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
breez said:
In these cases, you can treat the 2 masses as one mass whose total mass is the sum of the 2 masses correct?
For what purpose? (Describe the problem you're working on.)
 
In the problem, 3 blocks are connected by massless strings, and another string pulls the rightmost block on a frictionless surface. You have to find the tension in the smaller strings in terms of the block masses, tension in the rightmost string, and the uniform acceleration.
 
Since the strings are taut, all three blocks have the same acceleration. You are free to choose your system as you see fit in order to solve the problem. For example, you can treat all three blocks as a single system or you can treat each block separately. (Or both!)

Just apply Newton's 2nd law to whatever system you choose and see what you can figure out. (Newton's 3rd law will help as well.)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top