Masses connected to spring momentum

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion, a problem involving two blocks connected by a spring on a frictionless table is analyzed. The first scenario has one block stationary while the other moves after the spring is released, achieving a speed of 2.0 m/s. In the second scenario, both blocks are released simultaneously, and the user attempts to calculate the speed of the lighter block using conservation of momentum principles. The user arrives at a speed of 1.79 m/s for the lighter block, but this is identified as incorrect, prompting a request for clarification on the formulas used and their applicability to the scenario. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly applying conservation laws in spring-mass systems.
Raj Kishore
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
An m = 1.3 kg block and an M = 3.0 kg block have a spring compressed between them and rest on a frictionless table. With a stopper in place that prevents m from moving, the spring is compressed and released so that M moves away with a speed 2.0 m/s.

q17 com.png


The spring is compressed exactly as before, but this time without the stopper in place. Both blocks are released at the same time. What is the speed of mass m when the spring stops acting on it?

The attempt at a solution
What I did to solve this was I used the equation vfM = 2vCM - v0M

vCM = (Mv0M + mv0m)/(m+M)

Then I said Mv0M = mvfm + MvfM

So, (Mv0M - MvfM)/m = vfm

I got the final answer to be 1.79 m/s, but it is wrong. Thanks for helping.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you explain your reasoning a bit more? Where did vfM = 2vCM - v0M come from, for example?
 
That is a formula we were taught
 
Well, it seems wrong to me. How do you know is applies here?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top