B Mastering Compound Angles for Perfect Molding Installation

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter arydberg
  • Start date Start date
arydberg
Messages
244
Reaction score
31
A carpender wants to install molding on the cealing of a room. He needs it to turn a 90 degree corner. In the old days the molding had a trianglar cross section and he had to cut it at a 45 degree setting angle. This was simple.

Today however the molding comes in a flat section. It has to be placed on the wall at 45 degrees to the wall and 45 degrees to the cealing with a trianglar air space behind it. Now he needs it to turn a 90 degree corner.

The way to do this is to cut the molding with a compound angle saw. That is the saw is angled with respect to the center line of the molding called the setting and the saw is tilted with respect to the plane of the molding.

The question is how do you figure out the angle of the tilt and the angle of the blade setting.

I think the answer involves the dot product.

btw In the real world the saws simpley come with the angles marked on the saw.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
arydberg said:
A carpender wants to install molding on the cealing of a room. He needs it to turn a 90 degree corner. In the old days the molding had a trianglar cross section and he had to cut it at a 45 degree setting angle. This was simple.

Today however the molding comes in a flat section. It has to be placed on the wall at 45 degrees to the wall and 45 degrees to the cealing with a trianglar air space behind it. Now he needs it to turn a 90 degree corner.

The way to do this is to cut the molding with a compound angle saw. That is the saw is angled with respect to the center line of the molding called the setting and the saw is tilted with respect to the plane of the molding.

The question is how do you figure out the angle of the tilt and the angle of the blade setting.

I think the answer involves the dot product.
I don't believe it does.
arydberg said:
btw In the real world the saws simpley come with the angles marked on the saw.
What I would do is put together a fixture that holds the molding at an angle of 45° off of vertical, the same way the molding goes on the wall and ceiling, then turn the saw blade 45° and make the cut. The cut for the other molding piece should be the mirror image of the first cut.
 
  • Like
Likes jim mcnamara
arydberg said:
I think the answer involves the dot product.
No. If you have the standard formula for the planes (a point in the plane and the normal vector), the cross product of the normal vectors results in a vector along the intersection line. Unfortunately the answer is not quite that easy, since you do not have planes but three-dimensional objects...
 
@Mark44 = his answer is exactly what is done. Those fixtures he refers to are called "jigs" by woodworkers and carpenters. Ex: cutting crown moulding for a complex china closet without a jig would be a very expensive operation: lots of wasted pieces at $20USD per board foot.
 
My question is how do you use mathametics to solve the problem?
 
  • Like
Likes Stephen Tashi
arydberg said:
My question is how do you use mathametics to solve the problem?
My answer uses geometry.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top