Mastering DSP: Fourier Series & Transforms

AI Thread Summary
To master Digital Signal Processing (DSP) and Fourier series and transforms quickly, it's recommended to start with Laplace transforms before progressing to Fourier and Z transforms. A highly regarded resource is "Introduction to Digital Signal Processing" by Johnny R. Johnson, which is beneficial for newcomers. Another essential text is the Oppenheim-Schafer book, considered a foundational reference in the field. However, achieving mastery in this complex subject is challenging and typically requires substantial study time, especially for those without a strong math background. Quick mastery may not be realistic unless one has advanced mathematical skills.
madchiller
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
hi i wanted to know if anybody that knew about dsp and all the Fourier series and transforms had any advice on how to master it ... very swiftly..
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
madchiller said:
hi i wanted to know if anybody that knew about dsp and all the Fourier series and transforms had any advice on how to master it ... very swiftly..

Hmmm...Looking for a short-cut, eh?
Is it for here, or to-go? Do you need ketchup with that? Just kidding :).

When I was a TA, I recommended this book that cuts to the chase: Introduction to Digital Signal Processing, by Johnny R Johnson. It was pretty helpful to the new comers to DSP.

You need some background on integral transforms.
Start from Laplace transforms and then quickly move into Fourier and z and what have you...

The best book is by Oppenheim-Schafer. Its a bible...
 
thanks a lot so if I understood you right i start with LAPPLACE and I go on with the rest, thanks a lot of replying and for the book tip.
 
sai_2008 said:
The best book is by Oppenheim-Schafer. Its a bible...

lol, i have this. it ain't no shortcut.

i don't think master and quickly really go together here unless you're already a math savant, which is why you get few replies. i just had the one college course (roughly, 10 weeks), and didn't come away feeling like i had "mastered" the subject.
 
i have an applied & pure math degree just getting adjusted to the " engineering " math notation ...
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top