A Mastering General Relativity: Student Experiences

kent davidge
Messages
931
Reaction score
56
In my Google searchs and by reading threads on this forum I've seen that the books people most recommend on general relativity are
Graviation, by Thorne, Wheeler and Misner,
Wald's book and
Weinberg's book.

I'm in the first year to get a bachelor degree on physics and I could read any of these books at the university library. I've read a little bit of MTW, but I don't like the way it states the subjects (like, metric is a machine with two slots to which you put two vectors), I prefer something more formal, like metric is a mapping from V x V to R.

I'd like to know some experiences from someone on this forum when at student years. What books did you read at that time? How did you get your knowledge on this fascinating subject?

hey, I don't know if the thread tittle is appropriate, in any case please excuse my poor english.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I used Sean Carroll's online notes when I was in my 3d year. Still recommended. Zee's book is also great; I consider it to be the successor of mtw. But, like mtw, it's phonebook-thick.
 
  • Like
Likes kent davidge
As a first and second-year undergrad, I tried to read Spacetime Physics, Gravitation/MTW, and Schutz's book on my own... MTW was slow going... but I'd come back to it every now and then.
My modern physics professor suggested Geroch's GR from A to B... interesting viewpoint, but seemed too verbose and elementary at the time.
Later in undergrad, I took various courses that used Ray Skinner's book, Landau's book, and [as an independent study] Lawden.
Only later would I appreciate Geroch's viewpoints when I sat in on his class [after taking Wald's course in grad school]. This was my "a-ha" moment.
You may find some interesting material here: http://home.uchicago.edu/~geroch/
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes kent davidge
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
Back
Top