Mastering Integrals: Solving for cos(2x) and Other Trigonometric Functions

  • Thread starter Thread starter sunfleck
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrals
sunfleck
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello :)

I'm not sure how to deal with an integral of the form cos(2x), sin(2x), tan(3x), etc. Its the constant that is throwing me off - I know what the antideriv of cosx, sinx or tanx is. My text doesn't seem to explain what to do with the constant and I can't seem to find the info using a direct internet search so I was wondering if someone would please tell me what to do with the constant?

Help would be greatly appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Substitute u=2x, du=2*dx. Do the u integral and substitute back.
 
Dick said:
Substitute u=2x, du=2*dx. Do the u integral and substitute back.


Thanks, but we actually haven't covered the sub rule yet so I'm wondering if maybe there is a different way to get the answer?

Updating because I found a similar question in my text...
The text has a problem showing..

\int sin( \Pi x)dx = -(1/ \Pi )cos( \Pi x)dx

So I take it if f(x) = cos(2x)dx then F(x) = (1/2)sin(2x)... but the chpt explaining the sub rule says something about changing the boundaries of a definate integral when using the sub rule... Would I have to do anything to the boundaries? (I've been asked to solve using FTC where \int \stackrel{b}{a} = F(b) - F(a) ) --I found that problem in the sub rule section which is why I'm confused about the boundaries--
 
Last edited:
Ok. The integral of sin(2x) is -(1/2)*cos(2x). You can check that just be differentiating -(1/2)*cos(2x) and seeing that you get sin(2x). The antiderivative -(1/2)*cos(2x) is expressed in terms of the original variable x. So the limits are the same as the original limits. You don't have to change them.
 
Oh right.. that makes sense! Thanks for taking the time to reply :)
 
sunfleck said:
Thanks, but we actually haven't covered the sub rule yet so I'm wondering if maybe there is a different way to get the answer?
I don't think there's a substitution rule, per se. Substitution is nothing more than applying the chain rule of differentiation to antidifferentiation.
sunfleck said:
Updating because I found a similar question in my text...
The text has a problem showing..

\int sin( \Pi x)dx = -(1/ \Pi )cos( \Pi x)dx

So I take it if f(x) = cos(2x)dx then F(x) = (1/2)sin(2x)... but the chpt explaining the sub rule says something about changing the boundaries of a definate integral when using the sub rule... Would I have to do anything to the boundaries? (I've been asked to solve using FTC where \int \stackrel{b}{a} = F(b) - F(a) ) --I found that problem in the sub rule section which is why I'm confused about the boundaries--

To expand on what I said above, if g(x) = sin(2x), then g'(x) = 2cos(2x). Looking at things from the opposite direction,
\int 2cos(2x) dx = sin(2x) + C
Equivalently,
\int cos(2x) dx = 1/2 sin(2x) + C_1
where C1 = C/2.

Here's a slightly more complicated problem:
\int xcos(x^2) dx

For this problem, I can see that part of the integrand is cos(x^2), so I think of this as being cos(u(x)), where u(x) = x^2. I see also that du/dx = 2x, so it's helpful that the other factor in the integrand is x.

So x*cos(x^2)*dx = 1/2 * du/dx * cos(u) * dx = 1/2 * cos(u)*du

I know that
\int cos(u) du = sin(u) + C_1
so

\int 1/2*cos(u) du = 1/2*sin(u) + C

= 1/2*sin(x^2) + C
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top