Match the inequalities with the corresponding statements.

  • Thread starter Thread starter name_ask17
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequalities Match
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around matching inequalities to their corresponding statements. The inequalities presented are |a-5|< 1/3 and |a-1/3|< 5, with the statements reflecting distances from specific points. A participant initially solved both inequalities and arrived at the same range for 'a', leading to confusion about the correctness of the statements. Clarifications were provided, emphasizing that |a-5| represents the distance from 'a' to 5, and that understanding the geometric interpretation of inequalities is crucial for accurate matching. Ultimately, the importance of correctly interpreting the inequalities rather than solely relying on algebraic solutions was highlighted.
name_ask17
Messages
146
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



PROBLEM: Match the inequalities with the corresponding statements.
INEQUALITIES: 1) |a-5|< 1/3
2) |a- 1/3|< 5
STATEMENTS: a) The distance from a to 5 is less than 1/3
b) a is less than 5 units from 1/3



The Attempt at a Solution



I solved for a for both problems and for both problems I am getting 14/3 < a< 16/3.
My problem is that since I am getting the same solution for both problems, then aren't both the statements (a and b) correct for both of the inequalities? Or am I getting the wrong answers when I solve the inequalities? Please advise if you see the problem. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems you've solved the inequalities incorrectly, but solving them really isn't necessary. You want to be able to interpret the inequalities as written. For example, what does |a-5| correspond to geometrically?
 
Of course, vela is correct, but if you want to check what's wrong with your algebraic method, show how you get the answer for each inequality.
 
VELA: Geometrically, |a-5| corresponds to moving a over right 5, correct? But how does that help me interpret the inequality as written? Or am I interpreting it incorrecly. Please advise.

SAMMY: This is how I worked the first one out algebraically.
|a-5|< 1/3 has two solutions right? One positive and one negative?
Solution 1:
a-5 < 1/3
a< 1/3 + 5
a < 16/3

and a-5 > -1/3
a > -1/3 + 5
a > 14/3

So that gives me 14/3 < a< 16/3.
And I worked out the second problem with the same steps to get the same answer. I'm confused.
 
name_ask17 said:
So that gives me 14/3 < a< 16/3.
And I worked out the second problem with the same steps to get the same answer. I'm confused.

You made a mistake:
|a-1/3|<5 means -5<a-1/3<5. Adding 5 to all sides, you get a negative number on the left. You just missed that minus sign.

ehild
 
name_ask17 said:
VELA: Geometrically, |a-5| corresponds to moving a over right 5, correct? But how does that help me interpret the inequality as written? Or am I interpreting it incorrecly. Please advise.
No, |a - 5| represents the distance between a and 5. Looking at things in terms of transformations, which you seem to be doing, the graph of y = |x - 5| can be seen as the translation of the graph of y = |x| by 5 units to the right.
name_ask17 said:
SAMMY: This is how I worked the first one out algebraically.
|a-5|< 1/3 has two solutions right? One positive and one negative?
Solution 1:
a-5 < 1/3
a< 1/3 + 5
a < 16/3

and a-5 > -1/3
a > -1/3 + 5
a > 14/3

So that gives me 14/3 < a< 16/3.
And I worked out the second problem with the same steps to get the same answer. I'm confused.
 
name_ask17 said:
VELA: Geometrically, |a-5| corresponds to moving a over right 5, correct? But how does that help me interpret the inequality as written? Or am I interpreting it incorrecly. Please advise.
No. |a-5| is equal to the distance between a and 5. For example, when a=4 which is a distance of 1 away from 5 on the number line, you get |a-5|=1. Similarly, a=6.5, which is 1.5 more than 5, you get |a-5|=1.5.

So if you had an inequality like |x-1| < 2, you can interpret that as

Code:
|x-1|  =  "the distance between [i]x[/i] and 1"
  <    =  "is less than"
  2    =  "two"
 
ahh. just what i needed. thanks to all(:
 
Back
Top