Material Derivative: Show F(x,y,z,t) Moves with Fluid

coverband
Messages
170
Reaction score
1
A fluid moves so that its velocity is \vec {u} \equiv (2xt,-yt,-zt), written in rectangular Cartesian coordinates. Show that the surface F(x,y,z,t) = x^2exp (-2t^2)+(y^2+2z^2)exp(t^2)=constant moves with the fluid (so that it always contains the same fluid particles; that is, DF/Dt=0)



Homework Equations


I got this from http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Marine..._Wave_Theory#Kinematic_Free_Surface_Condition

\frac{DF(x,y,z,t)}{Dt}=w. If the surface is defined by z=A(x,y,t), then w = \frac {\partial A}{\partial t} + u \frac {\partial A}{\partial x}+v \frac{\partial A}{\partial y} but I'm confused. If A refers to the surface, my surface has z's in it. Also what does the F stand for in the wiki equations



The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe F is also the surface. If you look at one of the prior sections, it says,

...the total derivative of the water surface will be zero, since we move with the surface. Thus on any surface,
\frac{DF(x,y,z,t)}{Dt}=0


I would also assume that if your surface has a component of z in it, you cannot use that form of the derivative and must use the total derivative.
 
Thanks very much
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top