Schools Materials Science grad school questions

AI Thread Summary
A rising junior physics major with a math minor is considering pursuing a PhD in materials science but has not yet taken introductory chemistry. Initially planning to complete the chemistry sequence in their senior year, they are now contemplating whether to take organic and analytical chemistry to strengthen their foundation for graduate studies. The interdisciplinary nature of materials science allows for acceptance of students with backgrounds in both physics and chemistry, raising questions about the necessary chemistry coursework. Scheduling conflicts complicate their decision, as taking chemistry this year would require dropping General Relativity, which is perceived as beneficial for applied physics graduate programs. Concerns are also raised about the potential need for remedial courses in materials science if only the first year of chemistry is completed. Additionally, clarification is sought on the distinction between materials science and materials engineering. The discussion emphasizes the importance of foundational chemistry knowledge for aspiring scientists and engineers, suggesting that it should be prioritized over senior-level electives.
myranaira
Messages
39
Reaction score
1
I am a rising junior physics major and math minor at a small liberal arts school. I'm interested in possibly pursuing materials science for grad school (hoping to complete a PhD). However, I haven't yet taken intro-level chemistry.

Originally I was planning to complete the intro sequence in my senior year, but I've heard that it'd be better for me to also take some orgo, analytical chemistry, etc. to provide a more solid foundation for materials science. On the other hand, I've also read on various graduate school websites for Materials science that due to its interdisciplinary nature, students with both physics and chem backgrounds are accepted.

How much chemistry should I aim to take to get a solid foundation for materials science grad school, should I chose to pursue it? One of the main reasons I'm reluctant to take intro chem this year is because of scheduling conflicts. I'd have to take it at a different school or drop General Relativity, which I've heard would be useful for applied physics grad school - another area I'm looking into.

I've also read on some program websites that some incoming MS grad students are required to take remedial courses in materials science if they haven't taken them in undergrad. Would finishing only the first year of chemistry increase the amount of remedial courses I'd have to take?

Finally, could anyone explain the subtle difference between "materials science" and "materials engineering," if there is any?

Thanks in advance for reading and answering!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am surprised that general relativity is viewed as being useful for applied physics grad school. Sure, there may be a few uses (I have heard that high order corrections for GPS require GR ...), but I would think that intro chemistry should be required for any kind of pure/applied scientist and engineer before one worries about senior level electives. It is certainly beneficial. I am not a material scientist, so will not pretend to know any more than this.

jason
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top