Math Challenge - April 2020

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on various mathematical challenges, including topics such as linear operators in Banach spaces, hypothesis testing for normally distributed variables, and properties of differentiable functions. Key problems include showing the existence of unique continuations for bounded operators, testing hypotheses with a mean distance estimator, and proving properties of continuous functions. Solutions were provided by multiple users, demonstrating a collaborative effort to tackle complex mathematical concepts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of normed vector spaces and Banach spaces
  • Familiarity with hypothesis testing and statistical estimators
  • Knowledge of differential equations and initial value problems
  • Concepts of continuous functions and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of linear operators in functional analysis
  • Learn about statistical hypothesis testing and confidence intervals
  • Explore solutions to ordinary differential equations (ODEs) and their applications
  • Investigate the implications of continuity in mathematical functions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students in advanced mathematics courses, and anyone interested in solving complex mathematical problems and understanding their theoretical foundations.

  • #151
Not anonymous said:
Is there any function that can be expressed using only common standard functions and does not need to be written as a sum of infinite series that is continuous and differentiable in ##(0,1)## which has all rational numbers in its range and no other value as its zeros?
The range of any continuous map ##f:(0,1)\to\mathbb{R}## is connected, so if it contains ##\mathbb{Q}##, then it must be all of ##\mathbb{R}.## There are continuous surjections like this, e.g. ##f(x)=\tan(\pi(x-1/2)).## What do you mean by "no other values as its zeros"?

Not anonymous said:
Thanks for that example! It is nice to be able to prove something using just one simple theorem. But I am a bit confused about this function's relation to @wrobel's. @wrobel's function uses absolute value of ##f(x)## whereas yours does not, so your example appears to be of similar form but not exactly the same as the exponential of @wrobel's function. Am I missing something?
Okay, you're right, the exponential of wrobel's function is ##e^{-x}|f(x)|.## But since he is working on an interval where ##f## has no zeros, this is the same up to a possible minus sign. The point is that ##f## and ##e^f## have the same critical points, and negating doesn't change this.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
12K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
13K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
12K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
9K
  • · Replies 100 ·
4
Replies
100
Views
12K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
16K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
11K
  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
11K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
11K
  • · Replies 64 ·
3
Replies
64
Views
16K