# Mathematica differential equation

• Mathematica
On mathematica:
Solve the differential equation

d^2 x(t)/dt^2 + x(t)(x^2(t) − 1) + t = 0

numerically, subject to the initial conditions that x(0) = 1 and dx(0)/dt = 0. Use
Plot to plot the solution for the domain t 2 [0, 10].
2.

Above is what i'm trying to do. Below is what i've typed in on mathematica:

s = NDSolve[{x''[t] + (x[t]) (x[t]^2 - 1) + t == 0, x == 1,
x3' == 0}, x, {t, 0, 10}]

This is wrong, it says it's not a diff. equation. Where am i going wrong?

You have x3' instead of x'.
That's the only problem....

You have x3' instead of x'.
That's the only problem....

Sorry that was mistake, but it's still wrong, i've tryed everything i can think of.

n = NDSolve[{x''[t] + x[t] (x^2[t] - 1) + t == 0, x == 1,
x' == 0}, x[t], t, {t, 0, 10}]

above is what i got. Says duplicate variable t found, so it's still wrong. I'm not sure what to do, any ideas?

I have fought with the obsession of both Mathematica and the forum software to translate characters into what they think are best for your, despite that breaking this going in both directions.

Attached is a tiny working notebook. Do a binary byte-by-byte comparison with what you have in your notebook and see what is different.

#### Attachments

• nd.nb
3.7 KB · Views: 392
P-Jay: No, making the correction I suggested in your original code worked.
You've changed your code in your second post. It can be corrected by changing
x^2[t] -> x[t]^2
and by removing the extra t argument you had.

n2 = NDSolve[{x''[t] + x[t] (x[t]^2 - 1) + t == 0, x == 1, x' == 0}, x[t], {t, 0, 10}]

Finally, your first version was better, since you solved for x instead of x[t].
The former returns a pure interpolated function, while the latter returns the function evaluated at t, which is not as flexible.

For example, using the former version

n1 = NDSolve[{x''[t] + x[t] (x[t]^2 - 1) + t == 0, x == 1, x' == 0}, x, {t, 0, 10}]

you can plot the function and its derivative easily

Plot[Evaluate[{x[t], x'[t]} /. n1], {t, 0, 10}]

Doing the same with n2 is not as straight forward...