Mathematica Trouble: Solving for x in Sinc[x] > (1/1.01)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Airsteve0
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mathematica
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the inequality Sinc[x] > (1/1.01) for positive values of x within the interval 0 to Pi/2 using Mathematica. Users are encountering difficulties with the Solve and NSolve commands, despite knowing there is a single interval where the inequality holds true. A link to a Wolfram Alpha plot indicates the behavior of Sinc[x] in the specified range. The FindRoot function is suggested as a potential solution, yielding an approximate value of x around 0.244097. The conversation also points to a dedicated Math & Science Software section for more efficient assistance with Mathematica syntax.
Airsteve0
Messages
80
Reaction score
0
If anyone on here uses Mathematica maybe you could help me with an issue I am having with computing the following:

Solving for x in: Sinc[x] > (1/1.01)

I am looking only at the positive values and not making any headway with the Solve or NSolve commands. I should also mention that this only makes sense for the angle being between 0 and Pi/2.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
This
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=plot+sinc(x)+for+0+<+x+<+pi/2
shows there will be a single open interval where Sinc[x]>1/1.01 and 0<x<pi/2.

This
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=solve+sinc(x)==1/1.01+and+x>0
gives you the upper endpoint.

When you know there is a single simple interval for a solution then I would suspect that Mathematica might correctly accept

NSolve[Sinc[x]==1/1.01,x]

to give you that upper endpoint, but unfortunately I cannot verify that for you at the moment.

Note: There is the Math & Science Software section of the forum where many of the small questions about Mathematica syntax might be more quickly and better answered. Poke around several sections below the Math category and you will find it.
 
In[1]:= FindRoot[Sinc[x]-1/1.01,{x,.25}]

Out[1]= {x->0.244097}
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Back
Top