Mathematical Definition of a Primitive Cell

ehrenfest
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1
[SOLVED] primitive cell

Homework Statement


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primitive_cell
Could someone give me a mathematically rigorous of a primitive cell? I have read like 4 different definitions and none of them seem mathematically rigorous.
I think Wikipedia's definition is particularly ambiguous: "a minimum cell corresponding to a single lattice point" ?
In what sense is minimum being used? In what sense is cell being used?

EDIT: this should probably be in the Advanced Physics section but I cannot delete it or move it

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Someone PLEASE HELP this problem is driving me insane.

In the picture in the Crystal Structure section of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NaCl, what is the primitive cell AND WHY?
 
Last edited:
I think I understand now. Go to http://www.neutron.anl.gov/hyper-physics/bravais.html .

The primitive cell of the cubic face-centered structure of the NaCl lattice IS NOT THE CUBE. The cube is the CONVENTIONAL cell for the primitive face-centered cubic structure (e.g. NaCl) but IT CANNOT BE THE PRIMITIVE CELL BECAUSE IT CONTAINS 4 LATTICE POINTS WHICH IS MORE THAN 1.

The primitive cell of the the fcc crystal is actually a rhombohedron.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You got the idea :) Crystal structure is quite hard in the beginning, many new things to learn.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top