Mathematical prerequisites for Classical Mechanics

AI Thread Summary
To effectively understand Landau's and Lifschitz's textbook on Classical Mechanics, familiarity with real-variable calculus and linear algebra is essential. Additionally, knowledge of differential equations is recommended for a comprehensive grasp of the material. These mathematical foundations will enable readers to tackle the concepts presented in the text. Overall, a solid understanding of these areas will prepare one for the challenges of classical mechanics. Mastery of these prerequisites is crucial for success in the subject.
D.K.
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
So, I am about to read Landau's and Lifschitz's textbook on Classical Mechanics. What kind of mathematics I should be already familiar with in order to completely understand the above mentioned material? Would real-variable calculus and linear algebra be sufficient for the task?

Thanks for all the adivce.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
D.K. said:
So, I am about to read Landau's and Lifschitz's textbook on Classical Mechanics. What kind of mathematics I should be already familiar with in order to completely understand the above mentioned material? Would real-variable calculus and linear algebra be sufficient for the task?

Thanks for all the adivce.

You should also have familiarity with differential equations, but besides that yes that is sufficient.
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
View full post »

Similar threads

Prerequisite mathematics for intermediate mechanics?
Replies
4
Views
1K
Teach me about classical mechanics please
Replies
12
Views
2K
Musical instruments and mechanics
Replies
10
Views
2K
Books to read before Arnold's Classical Mechanics
Replies
5
Views
2K
Introduction to Modern Astrophysics -- What are the prerequisites?
Replies
2
Views
2K
Studying Modern physics after quantum mechanics
Replies
5
Views
2K
Mathematical background concerning classical physics/mechanics.
Replies
5
Views
2K
Classical Source recommendation on Differential Geometry
Replies
6
Views
3K
I States and observables in quantum mechanics
Replies
5
Views
871
Prerequisites for John Taylor classical mechanics
Replies
5
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top