Mathematical proofs, physics and time management

Dante Augusto
How important is for a physics undergraduate to know the mathematical proofs for every theorem learnd on the math courses? Is it better to trust the math, learn the intuitive notions, and then learn the methods and operations in a more mechanical way, memorizing formulas and steps through repetition, using math more as a tool? Or go through detailed mathematical proofs consequently spending less time grasping the physics concepts?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Dante Augusto said:
How important is for a physics undergraduate to know the mathematical proofs for every theorem learnd on the math courses? Is it better to trust the math, learn the intuitive notions, and then learn the methods and operations in a more mechanical way, memorizing formulas and steps through repetition, using math more as a tool? Or go through detailed mathematical proofs consequently spending less time grasping the physics concepts?

How important is it for you to intimately know how your car engine work, or how they assemble the airplane that you are about to fly on?

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes senperfect and Dante Augusto
Dante Augusto said:
How important is for a physics undergraduate to know the mathematical proofs for every theorem learnd on the math courses? Is it better to trust the math, learn the intuitive notions, and then learn the methods and operations in a more mechanical way, memorizing formulas and steps through repetition, using math more as a tool? Or go through detailed mathematical proofs consequently spending less time grasping the physics concepts?

I think you have to be pragmatic. You don't need to know the technical details, like the precise class of functions for which a theorem holds. But, working though a proof of Green's theorem or the Divergence theorem can give you a useful physical insight.

I would use my judgement about whether a better understanding of the maths is truly useful to you as a physicist. Linear algebra is another good example where you will have to decide where to draw the line between knowledge and a deeper understanding.
 
  • Like
Likes Dante Augusto
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top