Mathematical question i physics

nhrock3
Messages
403
Reaction score
0
\vec{E}=f_1(z-ct)\hat{x}+f_2(z-ct)\hat{y}+0\hat{z}<br /> f_1(u) and f_2(u) are functions of "u"
u=z-ct
i have the formula
\nabla \times \vec{E}=-\frac{db}{dt }
\nabla\times\vec{E}=|\begin{array}{ccc}<br /> \hat{x} &amp; \hat{y} &amp; \hat{z}\\<br /> \frac{{d}}{dx} &amp; {\frac{{d}}{dy}} &amp; \frac{{d}}{dz}|=\\<br /> f_{1}(z-ct) &amp; f_{2}(z-ct) &amp; 0\end{array}\hat{-x}\frac{{df_{2}}}{dz}-\hat{y}\frac{{df_{1}}}{dz}+\hat{z0}=-\frac{{d\overrightarrow{B}}}{dt}

i want to find B
so i need to integrate the left side by t
in order to get B
but f_1 f_2 are function of u
how to make a result
?


and then i need to show that B\bullet E=0
i can't get 0
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi nhrock3! :smile:

(write "tex" not "TEX"; and write "itex" rather than "tex", and it won't keep starting a new line :wink:)
nhrock3 said:
\vec{E}=f_1(z-ct)\hat{x}+f_2(z-ct)\hat{y}+0\hat{z}
f_1(u) and f_2(u) are functions of "u"
u=z-ct
i have the formula
\nabla \times \vec{E}=-\frac{db}{dt }
\nabla\times\vec{E}=|\begin{array}{ccc}<br /> \hat{x} &amp; \hat{y} &amp; \hat{z}\\<br /> \frac{{d}}{dx} &amp; {\frac{{d}}{dy}} &amp; \frac{{d}}{dz}|=\\<br /> f_{1}(z-ct) &amp; f_{2}(z-ct) &amp; 0\end{array}\hat{-x}\frac{{df_{2}}}{dz}-\hat{y}\frac{{df_{1}}}{dz}+\hat{z0}=-\frac{{d\overrightarrow{B}}}{dt}

i want to find B
so i need to integrate the left side by t
in order to get B
but f_1 f_2 are function of u
how to make a result
?


and then i need to show that B\bullet E=0
i can't get 0

you notation is very confused :redface:

perhaps because you are? :wink:

f1 is a function of only one variable, and has only one derivative, call it f1' …

(z - ct) is a function of two variables, and has two derivatives …

applying the chain rule:

∂f1(z - ct)/∂z = f1'(z - ct); ∂f1(z - ct)/∂t = -cf1'(z - ct) …​

carry on from there :smile:
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top