Programs Mathematics foundation for degree in Physics

AI Thread Summary
For a degree in Medical Physics, foundational mathematics includes first-year Linear Algebra and second-year Calculus, with additional beneficial courses being Calculus I, II, III, and Differential Equations. While specific mathematical courses may not be required, topics like "mathematical methods for physics" can provide essential tools without needing proof-based courses. Physics programs often incorporate necessary math within their curriculum, such as solving the Schrödinger equation in Quantum Mechanics. For Computer Science, beginners are encouraged to explore online resources like "Invent with Python" for foundational programming knowledge. Overall, the choice of math courses should align with the specific area of physics one intends to pursue.
MathewsMD
Messages
430
Reaction score
7
Hi,

After looking at future requirements for my program (Medical Physics), I realized it doesn't have as many specific math requirements as pure Physics module, but still has all the Physics requirements. I was just wondering, beyond first year Linear Algebra and second year Calculus, what mathematics courses would be specifically of benefit in pursuing a studies in Physics? I know more is always going to be helpful, but are there any that are particularly interesting or useful for a Physics major, whether for research- or course-related tasks?

I have the same question regarding Computer Science courses as well. I've also been looking online and does anyone have any online tutorials they would advise to beginners (no prior experience) for programming and general computer science knowledge? I have heard that learning the basics and learning them right is crucial, and any recommended programs would be greatly appreciated!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Physics is a broad field. It ranges from experimental physics to mathematical physics. So the amount of math you'll need in physics will depend greatly on what kind of physics you would like to do.

I think you should at least do Calculus I,II,III, Linear algebra and differential equations. Other than that, there are a lot of mathematical tools that physicists need, however they don't necessarily need to take the mathematical (proof-based) course for it. Usually, there will courses like "mathematical methods for physics" which cover the necessary material. So unless you're into mathematical physics or very mathy theoretical physics (or just enjoy math for the sake of math :smile:), you should just take those.

Other than that, many physics courses will usually teach the math necessary. For example, you usually don't need to take a PDE course for QM, because they will teach you how to solve the Schrodinger's equation in QM.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
What about a course in complex analysis?
 
MathewsMD said:
Hi,
I have the same question regarding Computer Science courses as well. I've also been looking online and does anyone have any online tutorials they would advise to beginners (no prior experience) for programming and general computer science knowledge?



I enjoyed this as a total no0b.

http://inventwithpython.com/

Likewise, the first 'Invent' PDF. It's written for kids so it might be simplistic but whatever, I learned something from it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
derek181 said:
What about a course in complex analysis?

I believe that's calculus III (3). Atleast, it's from what I'm from.
 
Strange said:
I believe that's calculus III (3). Atleast, it's from what I'm from.

I don't think many Calc III courses cover complex stuff. You'll rather see it in a math methods class or a specific complex variables/analysis class.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top