What Math Topics are Essential for 3D Programming?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jikx
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    3d Programming
AI Thread Summary
For 3D programming, linear algebra is identified as the most crucial mathematical subject, particularly for understanding vector spaces and transformations. A foundational knowledge of matrices and vectors is essential, as they are integral to 3D transformations and surface normals. While calculus may not be strictly necessary for linear algebra, it is often a prerequisite in academic settings. Additionally, a solid grasp of physics concepts, including motion laws and energy conservation, is vital for realistic 3D simulations. Overall, mastering these mathematical and physical principles is key to effective 3D game and model programming.
Jikx
Messages
206
Reaction score
0
I'm not sure where this goes, so if its wrong, please move it!

Anyway, I'm interested in 3D game/models programming, and i know that as it stands my maths knowledge is very difficient (i doubt stats will be of any use here).

If anyone could spare the time, could they have a peak through http://www.monash.edu.au/pubs/handbooks/undergrad/ug0481.htm and tell me what subjects are relavent?

Or maybe just tell me what kinds of topics i should be learning... thanks!

edit - i have no idea why that link was to the geosciences area , but is fixed now.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I'd say that the single most important subject you could take for 3d game design would be linear algebra. If you're going to be taking classes to get it, you'll probably need to take several pre-requisite courses first though.

My schools required calculus 1 and 2 before you could take Lin. Algebra.

If you're going to be studying on your own, you can probably get away with skipping the calculus. It's not needed for LA, but the subject requires a bit of mathematical sophistication, which is why they apply pre-req's to it.
 
Thanks for that !

Synopsis: Vector spaces, linear transformations. Determinants, eigenvalue problems. Inner products, symmetric matrices, quadratic forms. Jacobi iteration, Gauss-Seidel iteration, least squares approximation, power method. Applications to coding, computer graphics, geometry, dynamical systems, Markov chains, differential equations.

does that sound about right?
 
Knowing projective geometry is likely a must for 3D programming... unfortuately, I don't see it in the list.
 
I have (tried) programming 3D games (i used Direct3D).
Mainly, you will need to study physics more than math i would say :wink:.
In math, you will need to have some experience in matrices (they are widely used in transformations), and you need to know about Vectors (they will be used to find out stuff like the Normal of a surface). And of course, you shuold know a little bit about 3D in general (like what perpendicular means in 3D, how 2 surfaces can share in a line .. etc).
In physics, you will need to understand laws of motion, Newton laws, collisions, and maybe energy conservation and shapes of energy.
(this is what is on the top of my mind ATM).
 
Really, everything in practiced 3D is matrices. You barely even really need to know how to derive the matrices, just how to use them.

- Warren
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top