Matrix HELP! - Finding Matrices for AM = -MA

  • Thread starter Thread starter theacerf1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrices Matrix
theacerf1
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Matrix HELP!

Ok this question is in a cd quiz from a textbook, i have no idea what the question even means or how to do it. Please help!

Let M =

 7 −3
15 −7 .

Find all 2 × 2 matrices

A =
[ a b
b d ]

such that AM = −MA.
(Note that the solutions wanted should have equal (1, 2)- and (2, 1)-entries b.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org


M =
[7 -3
15 -7]

a 2x2 matrix
 


Did you even try? It is really just a matter of computation.

\begin{bmatrix}a & b \\ b & d\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}7 & -3 \\ 15 & -7\end{bmatrix}
= \begin{bmatrix}7a+ 15b & -3a- 7b \\ 7b+ 15d & -3b- 7d\end{bmatrix}
= -\begin{bmatrix}7 & -3 \\ 15 & -7\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}a & b \\ b & d\end{bmatrix}
= \begin{bmatrix}-7a+ 3b & -7b+ 3d \\ -15a+ 7b & -15b+ 7d\end{bmatrix}

So you must have 7a+ 15b= -7a+ 3b, -3a- 7b= -7b+ 3d, 7b+ 15d= -15a+ 7d, and -3b- 7d= -15b+ 7d.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Determine whether ##125## is a unit in ##\mathbb{Z_471}##'
This is the question, I understand the concept, in ##\mathbb{Z_n}## an element is a is a unit if and only if gcd( a,n) =1. My understanding of backwards substitution, ... i have using Euclidean algorithm, ##471 = 3⋅121 + 108## ##121 = 1⋅108 + 13## ##108 =8⋅13+4## ##13=3⋅4+1## ##4=4⋅1+0## using back-substitution, ##1=13-3⋅4## ##=(121-1⋅108)-3(108-8⋅13)## ... ##= 121-(471-3⋅121)-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24(471-3⋅121## ##=121-471+3⋅121-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24⋅471+72⋅121##...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
Back
Top